Teams

Escambia/Tan

2026 Escambia Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-21vs Bryan - RS ClaySplit 11
W#2 DoublesCherie Tan / Kristyn Miller vs Ingrid Corbett / Tammie Coco6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKimberly Fortier / Oliva Smith vs Sharon Powell / Sally Bergosh6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-04-14vs McElhany - PCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesStacey Martin / Kristyn Miller vs Denise Prindiville / Valerie Wilson7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCherie Tan / Van Hughes vs Terri Ammons / Denise Wilson7-5, 6-2
2026-04-13vs Bryan - RS ClayLost 02
L#1 DoublesCherie Tan / Dodi Stringfellow vs Mary Bryan / Ashley Wheeler2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesVan Hughes / Ashley Keigley vs Ingrid Corbett / Tammie Coco2-6, 5-7
2026-04-07vs Essex - SHLWon 40
W#1 DoublesVan Hughes / Rene Abel vs Alisha Krecidlo / Ashley Gruber7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesStacey Martin vs Shari Essex6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDodi Stringfellow / Aivel Dadisman vs Carol Essex / Dana Persons6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesOliva Smith / Kimberly Fortier vs Susan Rice / Katie Hovanec6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-30vs Nguyen - RS ClayWon 31
L#1 DoublesMelanie DiLoreto / Ashley Keigley vs Jeannette Fabbro / Karen Penn3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesParrish Walker vs Thuy Nguyen6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDodi Stringfellow / Rene Abel vs Gloria Langan / Bonnie Bucco7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesHeather Doerr / Kimberly Fortier vs Susan Barlow / Jennifer Capozzoli4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-03-20vs McElhany - PCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristyn Miller / Rene Abel vs Kate Major / Denise Wilson6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCherie Tan / Kimberly Fortier vs Jill Gonzalez / Elizabeth Klahorst6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesOliva Smith / Stacey Martin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-03-10vs Ford - RS ClayWon 40
W#1 DoublesKristyn Miller / Rene Abel vs Kim Gall / Peggy van Sleen6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesParrish Walker vs Sissy Ford6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAivel Dadisman / Chelsea Simpson vs Klara Szalai / Tori Baker6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKimberly Fortier / Oliva Smith vs Barbie Doherty / Kimberly Etscheid6-2, 6-3
2026-03-03vs Essex - SHLWon 31
W#1 DoublesKristyn Miller / Stacey Martin vs Sandra Wilson / Dana Persons6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesParrish Walker vs Alisha Krecidlo6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDodi Stringfellow / Cherie Tan vs Carolyn Bosworth / Ashley Gruber0-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesChelsea Simpson / Heather Doerr vs Katie Hovanec / Cheryl Vann7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Parrish Walker
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.81
Stacey Martin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.58
Rene Abel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.52
Kristyn Miller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.41
Cherie Tan
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.38
Van Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Melanie DiLoreto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Chelsea Simpson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Heather Doerr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Aivel Dadisman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ashley Keigley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Kimberly Fortier
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.22
Dodi Stringfellow
usually #2 Doubles 30%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.02
Oliva Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Maria Hicks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cherie Tan + Dodi Stringfellow361560% games−5.5% vs expected
Kristyn Miller + Rene Abel3265% gamesnot enough data
Cherie Tan + Rene Abel404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Parrish Walker
43W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.82
Stacey Martin
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.81
3.5
Rene Abel
122W–57L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.58
Kristyn Miller
134W–112L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Cherie Tan
146W–59L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Van Hughes
83W–83L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Melanie DiLoreto
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Chelsea Simpson
7W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Heather Doerr
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Aivel Dadisman
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Ashley Keigley
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kimberly Fortier
23W–3L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.24
3.5
Dodi Stringfellow
120W–64L career · 10 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Oliva Smith
15W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02
Maria Hicks
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.