Teams

BShane-ENO

2025 Eno River Mixed 18 & Over · 18 & Over Mixed 4.0 evening

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-25vs JCollins-ENOLost 12
W#1 DoublesEkaterina Seregina / Dash Rajarajhan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAmber Oberle / Michael Young vs Nicholas Lau / Elizabeth Heald3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMegan Chiles / John Chiles vs Jose Porrua / Christine Lee1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-07-24vs HRoss-ENOLost 12
L#1 DoublesBarry Gooch / Betsy Shane vs Meghan Howard / Andrew Pham3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Young / Amber Oberle vs Kevin Moyung / Caroline Yu2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMark Petersen / Karen Scherr vs Lynsey Easley / Lucas Hubbard7-5, 6-4
2025-07-04vs MPaul-ENOWon 21
W#1 DoublesBarry Gooch / Betsy Shane vs Jonathan Surrency / Katie Evans6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMark Scherr / Karen Scherr vs Keshia Green / Michael Weslander4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKeelin Mcloughlin / Dash Rajarajhan vs Aly Miller / Dipen Vyas2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-26vs LHabib-GRLost 12
W#1 DoublesMark Scherr / Karen Scherr vs Morgan McKinley / David Pierce6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBarry Gooch / Keelin Mcloughlin vs Kyle Faltisco / Cindy Faltisco2-3
L#3 DoublesLisa Montague / JAMES MONTAGUE vs Ivan Ross / Olivia Finley6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2025-06-15vs JPerry-CHTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMark Petersen / Betsy Shane vs Scott Benson / Torey Wahlstrom7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDash Rajarajhan / Ekaterina Seregina vs Will Lassiter / Leah Weinberger6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMegan Chiles / John Chiles vs Scott Williams / Sheridan Meltsner6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2025-06-12Won 21
L#1 DoublesDash Rajarajhan / Ekaterina Seregina vs Mary Clare Rosemeyer / Abhimanyu Joshi3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Montague / Mark Petersen vs Jack Hu / Kelsey Kowalski7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmber Oberle / Michael Young vs Lynise Devance / Destry Jordan6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-06-08vs JCollins-ENOLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Montague / JAMES MONTAGUE vs Tiffany Langino / Henry Kennelly1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Scherr / Mark Scherr vs Cameron Crump / Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBriana Oliver / John Chiles vs Erika Linnander / Youngjun Lee4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-05-22vs LHabib-GRWon 21
W#1 DoublesBarry Gooch / Betsy Shane vs Lina Habib / Trung Tran7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAmber Oberle / Michael Young vs Cindy Faltisco / Kyle Faltisco7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMegan Chiles / John Chiles vs Michael Hutchinson / Justyne Ross6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 18 & Over Mixed 4.0 evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HRoss-ENO7120413154
2JCollins-ENO6218618169
3BShane-ENO44121227210
4MPaul-ENO1761836239
5LHabib-GR1751940268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Ekaterina Seregina
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.89
Mark Scherr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.86
Briana Oliver
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Megan Chiles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Barry Gooch
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.73
Karen Scherr
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Lisa Montague
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Mark Petersen
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.52
Betsy Shane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Dash Rajarajhan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.40
Amber Oberle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.34
JAMES MONTAGUE
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Keelin Mcloughlin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Betsy Shane + Barry Gooch2449% games+7.2% vs expected
Karen Scherr + Mark Scherr4261% games+2.3% vs expected
Lisa Montague + JAMES MONTAGUE044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ekaterina Seregina
31W–3L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.98
4
Mark Scherr
144W–67L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Briana Oliver
36W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Megan Chiles
155W–47L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Barry Gooch
112W–110L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.75
Karen Scherr
26W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Lisa Montague
39W–48L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.67
Mark Petersen
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Betsy Shane
14W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Dash Rajarajhan
66W–54L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Amber Oberle
28W–18L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
JAMES MONTAGUE
29W–43L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
Keelin Mcloughlin
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.