Teams

Bryson

2023 Harford Tri-Level 18 & Over · Harford Tri-Level 3.5, 4.0, 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.12 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule19 played
2023-12-03vs FlemingWon 10
W#1 DoublesEboni Lance / Cathy Preisendorfer vs Geri Riley / Melanie Goss6-3, 6-4
2023-12-02vs StarnSplit 11
W#2 DoublesEboni Lance / Eeva Stenger vs Karla Cachiaras / Laura Barwick6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Hall / Erin Deneen vs Maneesha Ahluwalia / Sara Cabrera2-6, 2-6
2023-11-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRosanne Murphy / April Braxton vs Kim Fleming / Joell Ritchey3-6, 1-6
2023-11-18vs StarnWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatie Wille / Kathleen Dolan vs Carolyn Wescott / Kathy Pettus6-3, 6-1
2023-11-12vs FlemingWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristine Boyce / Katie Wille vs Mandi Santanello / Lama Shikani2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-11-11vs StarnLost 02
L#1 DoublesBarbara Citrano / Maureen Martin vs Joell Ritchey / Maureen Kolb6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNatalie Bryson / Geri Riley vs Laura Barwick / Mary McClelland5-7, 4-6
2023-11-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLaurie Klapka / Geri Riley vs Natalie Bryson / Danielle Barry1-6, 2-6
2023-11-04vs Deneen/HallWon 10
W#1 DoublesTheresa Hodge / Eboni Lance vs Kate Dempsey / Laurie Freese6-1, 6-0
2023-10-29vs StarnWon 20
W#1 DoublesRosanne Murphy / Barbara Citrano vs Joell Ritchey / Beverly Starn6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKathy Pettus / Erin Deneen vs Sara Cabrera / Mandi Santanello6-1, 7-5
2023-10-28vs StarnWon 10
W#1 DoublesDanielle Barry / Eboni Lance vs Karla Cachiaras / Melanie Goss6-3, 6-2
2023-10-22vs StarnLost 02
L#1 DoublesRosanne Murphy / April Braxton vs Kim Fleming / Maureen Kolb2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Wille / Stephanie Hutcheson vs Beyza Akcam / Sara Cabrera3-6, 1-6
2023-10-21Won 10
W#2 DoublesErin Deneen / Kathleen Dolan vs Stephanie Hutcheson / Sandra Carmen6-3, 6-0
2023-10-14vs StarnLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaureen Martin / Farzaneh Navid vs Joell Ritchey / Maureen Kolb5-7, 2-6
2023-10-08vs StarnLost 01
L#1 DoublesFarzaneh Navid / April Braxton vs Kim Fleming / Maureen Kolb0-6, 5-7
2023-10-02vs StarnLost 12
L#1 DoublesApril Braxton / Farzaneh Navid vs Joell Ritchey / Kim Fleming5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesEboni Lance / Lesley Tompkins - (DQ)* vs Mary McClelland / Karla Cachiaras3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesStephanie Hutcheson / Katie Wille vs Carolyn Wescott / Maneesha Ahluwalia6-1, 6-3
2023-09-30vs StarnLost 02
L#2 DoublesGeri Riley / Danielle Barry vs Terri Mrozinski / Bonnie Keating7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKatie Wille / Heather Hall vs Sara Cabrera / Carolyn Wescott1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-09-27vs StarnWon 10
W#1 DoublesGeri Riley / Melanie Goss vs Cathy Preisendorfer / Danielle Barry6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-09-25Won 10
W#2 DoublesSara Cabrera / Katie Wille vs Stephanie Hutcheson / Sandra Carmen6-4, 7-5
2023-09-23vs StarnWon 10
W#2 DoublesErin Deneen / Kathleen Dolan vs Mandi Santanello / Ashley Archibald6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Harford Tri-Level 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Eboni Lance
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.10
Barbara Citrano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
April Braxton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Farzaneh Navid
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.98
Rosanne Murphy
published
3.97
Natalie Bryson
published
3.97
Danielle Barry
published 4.5
3.79
Kathy Pettus
published
3.46
Geri Riley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.45
Lesley Tompkins
published
3.38
Katie Wille
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Erin Deneen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Farzaneh Navid + Barbara Citrano5653% gamesnot enough data
Natalie Bryson + April Braxton4159% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eboni Lance
357W–214L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
4.38
4.5
Barbara Citrano
63W–83L career · 2 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
April Braxton
79W–97L career · 4 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
4.09
4
Farzaneh Navid
119W–111L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%25%75%
4.09
Rosanne Murphy
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.98
Natalie Bryson
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.97
4.5
Danielle Barry
9W–25L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.97
Kathy Pettus
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
3.79
4
Geri Riley
33W–80L career · 5 lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.46
Lesley Tompkins
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
3.45
3.5
Katie Wille
59W–27L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Erin Deneen
35W–31L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.