Teams

Gladney, Julius

2026 Combo 18 & Over-JXN · Men 5.5

11 players · average NTRP 2.80 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-26vs Loftin, ChristopherLost 03
L#1 DoublesRay Jost / Kyle Carpenter vs Kevin Dotson / Weldon Doe3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJulius Gladney / adam alexander vs Lee Thorne / Parker Fowler2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStonie Lyons / Lance Lomax vs Tyler Walker / Walker Roberts6-7, 1-6
2026-08-19vs Lominick, RandyWon 21
W#1 DoublesRay Jost / Kyle Carpenter vs Jake Gartman / Chad Hartley6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJoseph Boler / DeMarcus Johnson vs Hunter Aikens / Suresh Alexander6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDeAngelo Sherrod / Chris Toaster vs Jason Waldrop / John Davis6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2026-08-12vs Smith, NathanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJulius Gladney / DeMarcus Johnson vs Walker Neal / Gage Rodriguez1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTripp Morris / Stonie Lyons vs Wes Price / Edward Resch2-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Men 5.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Loftin, Christopher1030117
2Gladney, Julius0112537
3Lominick, Randy0103635

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Ray Jost
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.82
Julius Gladney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
DeAngelo Sherrod
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Danny Burgess
published 3
2.75
Joseph Boler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
David Bagwell
published 3
2.51
DeMarcus Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.33
Chris Toaster
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Lance Lomax
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Stonie Lyons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
adam alexander
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joseph Boler + DeAngelo Sherrod123 matchesnot enough data
Lance Lomax + DeMarcus Johnson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ray Jost
24W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
Julius Gladney
19W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
DeAngelo Sherrod
13W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Danny Burgess
5W–4L career · type M · no lines in 2026
3%92%4%
2.76
Joseph Boler
13W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
David Bagwell
3W–6L career · type M · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
2.5
DeMarcus Johnson
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%48%52%
2.51
2.5
Chris Toaster
2W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
Lance Lomax
0W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Stonie Lyons
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
adam alexander
15W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.