Teams

CV-Palm Springs TC/Hoffman

2023 SoCal Doubles - CV · CV Women's 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#3 DoublesCeleste Manolas / Kathy Rogers vs Cheryl Capriola / Yoko McSweeney3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-11-28vs CV-Palm Desert Tennis Club/CannonLost 01
L#1 DoublesCeleste Armitage / Janice Campbell vs Doreen Buchy / Lisa Lucht4-6, 1-6
2023-11-25vs LLW-CV-Indian Wells TG/KouwabunpatLost 01
L#3 DoublesCeleste Manolas / Kathy Rogers vs Sonja Lampasi / Meg Maloney6-7, 3-6
2023-11-04vs CV-Sun City PD/Kim & McGeeWon 20
W#1 DoublesCeleste Armitage / Janice Campbell vs Manuela Andrews / Nadine Kim6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCeleste Manolas / Kathy Rogers vs Michele Mcgee / Lori Greenman4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCeleste Armitage / Kathalena Cocker vs Nancy Closson / Pamela Milroy1-6, 5-7
2023-10-21vs LLW-CV-Indian Wells TG/KouwabunpatLost 02
L#2 DoublesCeleste Armitage / Celeste Manolas vs Sally Sterling / Thelma Sahara0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Rogers / Susan Hope vs Tammy Pronenko / Judi Marchand2-6, 0-3
2023-10-14vs CV-Palm Desert Tennis Club/CannonLost 02
L#2 DoublesCeleste Armitage / Doris Hoffmann vs Sue Cannon / Janelle Washington2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKathalena Cocker / Celeste Manolas vs Mary Kern / Pam Stafford1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Amy Springer
published 4
3.75
Ginny Ehrlich
published
3.73
Maureen Jaramillo
published
3.67
Michelle Traeger
published
3.67
Celeste Armitage
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.60
Kathy Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.51
Celeste Manolas
published 3.5
3.40
Doris Hoffmann
published
3.37
Janie Erickson
published
3.30
Kathalena Cocker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Janice Campbell
published
Julie Exley
published
Susan Hope
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Celeste Armitage + Janice Campbell41040% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Rogers + Susan Hope5360% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Springer
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.96
Ginny Ehrlich
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
Maureen Jaramillo
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Michelle Traeger
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Celeste Armitage
70W–83L career · 5 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
3.5
Kathy Rogers
108W–60L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%23%77%
3.60
3.5
Celeste Manolas
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.51
Doris Hoffmann
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
Janie Erickson
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Kathalena Cocker
135W–140L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
Janice Campbell
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Exley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Hope
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.