Teams

GOLD RIVER RC CW7.5B

2025 COMBO · Women 7.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-09-11vs BROADSTONE RC CW7.5CLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Seyler / Janet Wilkes-Heieck vs Christina Charn / Mary Heller2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan L Haensel / Robin Miotke vs Amandeep Kaur / Karin Shelton3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKristin Miguel / Debbie Rock vs Maureen Snyder / Mary Wilson2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Laura Garrick
published
3.60
Lisa Podlipnik
published
3.60
Claudia Weiler
published 4
3.50
Loni Ghiorso
published
3.42
Victoria Dowd
published
3.40
Susan L Haensel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Mary Seyler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Corinne Morton
published 3.5
3.26
Laura Derry
published
3.23
Katie Clyde
published
3.21
Debbie Rock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Marisa Schiffman
published
Erenne Hedges
published
Janet Wilkes-Heieck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jeanne Bovill
published
Kristin Miguel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robin Miotke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sandi Miller
published
Sandy Plumb
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Seyler + Victoria Dowd6161% games+13.5% vs expected
Victoria Dowd + Laura Derry3453% games−0.4% vs expected
Marisa Schiffman + Susan L Haensel3546% games−3.2% vs expected
Laura Garrick + Kristin Miguel123 matchesnot enough data
Mary Seyler + Loni Ghiorso033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Garrick
5W–15L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Lisa Podlipnik
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Claudia Weiler
12W–15L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Loni Ghiorso
3W–20L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
Victoria Dowd
33W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Susan L Haensel
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.40
Mary Seyler
19W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Corinne Morton
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
Laura Derry
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Katie Clyde
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Debbie Rock
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Marisa Schiffman
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Erenne Hedges
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Janet Wilkes-Heieck
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jeanne Bovill
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristin Miguel
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Robin Miotke
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sandi Miller
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Plumb
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.