Teams

WNCF Mabunga (ARC South)

NC Singles League 18 & Over WNC 2026 · 18+ Singles Men 3.0 - Sun PM

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-09vs WNCJ Colavecchia (Aston Park)Won 21
L#1 SinglesPeter Cook vs Mark Whyman0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesHeath Cope vs Oby Arnold6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesDaniel Maness vs Jeff Colavecchia6-3, 6-4
2026-08-08vs WNCJ Colavecchia (Aston Park)Won 21
W#1 SinglesDrew Dawson vs Oby Arnold6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesPeter Cook vs Samuel Arnold1-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesFrancis Mabunga vs Jeff Colavecchia6-2, 6-3
2026-07-26vs WNCD Moore (Aston Park)Won 21
L#1 SinglesHeath Cope vs Jin Choi5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesDaniel Maness vs Lee Scharff7-5, 6-4
W#3 SinglesRyan Kohout vs Daniel Moore7-5, 6-2
2026-07-12vs WNCD Berchenko (CCA)Won 21
W#1 SinglesDrew Dawson vs Daniel Berchenko6-4, 7-5
L#2 SinglesHeath Cope vs Leon Tu4-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesEdward McMillan vs Eric Zickerman6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-07-05vs WNCD Moore (Aston Park)Won 21
L#1 SinglesPeter Cook vs Ryan Bateson2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesDrew Dawson vs Lee Scharff6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesEdward McMillan vs Daniel Moore6-4, 6-1
2026-06-21vs WNCD Berchenko (CCA)Won 30
W#1 SinglesRyan Kohout vs John Oneill6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesEdward McMillan vs Eric Zickerman6-4, 6-4
W#3 SinglesDaniel Maness vs John Hilty6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 18+ Singles Men 3.0 - Sun PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WNCF Mabunga (ARC South)6013511128
2WNCD Moore (Aston Park)4211715151
3WNCD Berchenko (CCA)2471122158
4WNCJ Colavecchia (Aston Park)0651327174

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Heath Cope
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.89
Drew Dawson
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.78
Edward McMillan
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.70
Francis Mabunga
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.59
Peter Cook
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.58
Daniel Maness
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Ryan Kohout
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Cook + Edward McMillan3254% games+13.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heath Cope
28W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
Drew Dawson
23W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Edward McMillan
13W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Francis Mabunga
12W–43L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
Peter Cook
13W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.59
3
Daniel Maness
7W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
Ryan Kohout
6W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.