Teams

4 Westwood Kelly

2021 Richmond Combo Mixed · Combo Mixed 8.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.43 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-11-06vs 14 Salisbury BerryWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnna Shea / Grant Slegowski vs Suzanne Spiller / David Scheetz6-3, 6-2
2021-11-02vs 2 Belmont Carman Mixed UpLost 01
L#3 DoublesClara Laing / Grant Slegowski vs Julie Ruth / Logan Gruhl1-6, 4-6
2021-10-17vs 6 TCRC Green/StuckeyWon 10
W#2 DoublesClara Laing / Grant Slegowski vs Lucinda Stuckey / JINESH KUMAR CHINNATHAMBI6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo Mixed 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.83
Clara Laing
published 5
4.45
Kevin Long
published
4.34
Robert Quinn
published
4.28
Elizabeth Kelly
published 4.5
Anna Shea
published 4.5
4.23
Todd Prince
published
4.23
Ryan Baker
published
4.21
Carter King
published 4.5
4.11
Mark Schwartz
published
3.97
Grant Slegowski
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.84
Greg Robinson
published 4
3.67
Lauren Jones
published
3.62
Dutch Jones
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Jones + Dutch Jones314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Clara Laing
6W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
4.83
Kevin Long
0W–5L career · no lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
4.45
Robert Quinn
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
4.34
4.5
Elizabeth Kelly
35W–23L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Anna Shea
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Todd Prince
11W–8L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.23
Ryan Baker
29W–11L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Carter King
7W–2L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
4.21
Mark Schwartz
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
4.11
4.5
Grant Slegowski
153W–43L career · 3 lines in 2021
58%42%<1%
3.97
4
Greg Robinson
6W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.84
Lauren Jones
19W–8L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Dutch Jones
14W–16L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.