Teams

Plummer/Memphis

2026 Mixed 18 & Over - Memphis · 2.5 Mixed 18 & Over

3 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-18vs Battle/MemphisWon 20
W#2 DoublesAndre Johnson / Marnisha Boddie vs John Ryall / Mary Allison Becksfort2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNicholas Newsom / Amber Sand vs Louis Connelly / Sarah Stuart6-0, 6-1
2026-07-11vs Silk/MemphisLost 01
L#1 DoublesJonathan Dyson / Deanah Mack vs Laurin Murk / Marjorie Porter0-6, 0-6
2026-06-27vs Fly/MemphisWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndre Johnson / Rachel Spangler vs Ben Gilluly / Laura Gilluly6-2, 6-1
2026-06-24vs Battle/MemphisWon 10
W#1 DoublesLV Plummer / Amber Sand vs Allie Olson Battle / Elliott Dent6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-13vs Silk/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesChad Collett / Amber Sand vs Paul Shifflet / Kate Sullivan2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJonathan Dyson / Deanah Mack vs Nathan Evans / Marjorie Porter1-6, 0-6
2026-06-06vs Fly/MemphisWon 10
W#2 DoublesNadine Emil / Andre Johnson vs Joshua Shipley / Colleen Wilson6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5 Mixed 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fly/Memphis4211716152
2Plummer/Memphis4212617141
3Silk/Memphis339919141
4Battle/Memphis1541432203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.22 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Deanah Mack
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.25
Andre Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.19
Amber Sand
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Deanah Mack
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Andre Johnson
6W–7L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Amber Sand
10W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.