Teams

FK - Connor/Hagan

2022 Marion Combo 50 & Over · 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-12-03vs MARION/Joyce/Women/6.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLeigh McPherson / Rhonda Sangster vs Helen Sweeney / Toni Maiques6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-10-29vs MARION/Joyce/Women/6.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesLeigh McPherson / Rhonda Sangster vs Nancy Wallace / Joan Kelsey6-2, 6-0
2022-10-08vs MARION/Joyce/Women/6.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesNatalie Petsche / Rhonda Sangster vs Suteera Chaisumrej Joyce / Ketty Smith6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Carol Mecca
published 3.5
Cheryl Prusak
published 3.5
2.65
Donna Davis
published 3
2.60
Joan Matlock
published
2.56
CARMEL CONNOR
published 3
Julie Haynes
published
Leslie Hagan
published
Mary Stevens
published
Monique Foster
published
Natalie Petsche
published
Rhonda Sangster
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Trish Mosby
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Stevens + CARMEL CONNOR123 matchesnot enough data
Carol Mecca + Julie Haynes303 matchesnot enough data
Joan Matlock + CARMEL CONNOR213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Mecca
7W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Cheryl Prusak
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Donna Davis
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
Joan Matlock
27W–50L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
CARMEL CONNOR
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
2.56
Julie Haynes
10W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Leslie Hagan
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Stevens
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Monique Foster
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Natalie Petsche
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rhonda Sangster
125W–102L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Trish Mosby
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.