Teams

JPobst-DUR

2026 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 Over Adult 3.5 Men Wknd

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-02vs RVora-UNCLost 12
L#1 DoublesVarun Patel / Stephen Mills vs Ruchir Vora / Ted Bohlin1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMatthew Ruterbories / Henrique Perez vs Derek Saccoccio / Peter Bream6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJordin Peiffer / Pete Gryson vs Cary Levine / Evan Zeitler0-6, 0-6
2026-04-11vs SPanthri-DURLost 03
L#2 DoublesAbram Graham / Matthew Ruterbories vs Shivam Panthri / Adam Bernstein0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJeff Pobst vs Kirill Kochkin4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPete Gryson / Jordin Peiffer vs Anish Arya / Kevin Kokal1-6, 1-6
2026-03-28vs TKharva-DURWon 10
W#2 DoublesVarun Patel / Henrique Perez vs Anthony Rizzuto / Joshua Hunter6-4, 7-5
2026-03-26vs RVora-UNCLost 13
L#1 DoublesAbram Graham / Jeff Pobst vs James White / Stuart Beeson2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Lloyd / Victor Labarthe vs Ruchir Vora / Peter Z Tawil3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesElias Peters vs Cary Levine6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesVarun Patel / Jordin Peiffer vs Evan Zeitler / Danyu Lin2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-03-21vs CMoffitt_DURLost 01
L#3 DoublesJackson Freeman / Henrique Perez vs Sathyan Guru / Kobi Talma6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-03-07vs JMontague-DURLost 01
L#2 DoublesJordin Peiffer / Henrique Perez vs Conor Kregecz / Tanner Dellinger3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 Over Adult 3.5 Men Wknd have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Henrique Perez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Abram Graham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Elias Peters
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.14
Jeff Pobst
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Matthew Ruterbories
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Jordin Peiffer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Pete Gryson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jackson Freeman
published
Stephen Mills
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Varun Patel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Victor Labarthe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Henrique Perez
49W–30L career · type D · 6 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Abram Graham
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Elias Peters
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
Jeff Pobst
19W–6L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.14
Matthew Ruterbories
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98
Jordin Peiffer
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.90
Pete Gryson
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
2.80
Jackson Freeman
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephen Mills
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Varun Patel
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Victor Labarthe
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.