Teams

Coastal Crushers

2025 Hampton Roads Adult 18 & Over Weeknight · Hampton Roads Adult 18 & Over Weeknight 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-02vs TewSplit 11
L#1 DoublesShielito Riodique / Janice Sabio vs Anne Tew / Kelsey Sarcone2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJanet Marx / Haylee Wilson vs Angelica Suciu / Carol Branch7-6, 6-2
2025-05-27vs TewLost 01
L#2 DoublesJanet Marx / Janice Sabio vs Anne Tew / Cara Mae Melton4-6, 1-6
2025-05-19vs TewWon 10
W#2 DoublesTammy Berry / Janice Sabio vs Glenda Craddock / Norma Young7-6, 6-1
2025-04-28vs TewLost 02
L#2 DoublesJanet Marx / Shielito Riodique vs Lauren Kiger / Kelsey Sarcone0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCourtney Morrall / Janice Sabio vs Norma Young / Christie Jackson2-6, 1-6
2025-04-21vs TewSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJanet Marx / Shielito Riodique vs Carrie Coleman / Kathryn Fraim4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesYumiko Dooley / Janice Sabio vs Christie Jackson / Norma Young3-6, 2-6
2025-03-24vs TewSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTammy Berry / Janet Marx vs Anne Tew / Christie Jackson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJanice Sabio / Shielito Riodique vs Kathryn Fraim / Carrie Coleman6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Hampton Roads Adult 18 & Over Weeknight 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Janice Sabio
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Laurin Haupt
published
3.35
Shielito Riodique
published
3.34
Tammy Berry
published
3.31
Erica Sartwell
published
3.29
Janet Marx
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
CAROLINE Sugg
published 3.5
Ludy Milne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammy Berry + Janet Marx5078% games+10.0% vs expected
Laurin Haupt + Janice Sabio303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Janice Sabio
46W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Laurin Haupt
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Shielito Riodique
9W–0L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Tammy Berry
8W–0L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Erica Sartwell
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Janet Marx
103W–74L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
CAROLINE Sugg
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ludy Milne
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.