Teams

Team 1 The 40 Loves

2022 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.90 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-02-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesJoyce Aramburu / Miriam Smolen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-02-15Split 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Boulineaux / Miriam Smolen vs Laura Jairam / Jodi Seth1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJoyce Aramburu vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-02-12Split 11
W#1 DoublesJoyce Aramburu / Miriam Smolen vs Joi Ruther / Yolanda Tsai1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Boulineaux / Lynnita Montague-Daddio vs Celeste Linthicum / Carey Mottet3-6, 0-6
2022-02-05vs Team 4 Sassy SmashersLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Boulineaux / Lynnita Montague-Daddio vs Celeste Linthicum / Patricia Hathaway1-6, 1-6
2022-01-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Heuer / Lynnita Montague-Daddio vs Jennifer Park / Liliana Molina6-1, 6-2
2022-01-28vs Team 4 Sassy SmashersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Boulineaux / Miriam Smolen vs Patricia Hathaway / Celeste Linthicum7-6, 2-3
W#1 SinglesJoyce Aramburu vs Sandra Kim6-4, 6-3
2022-01-21Won 20
W#1 DoublesJoyce Aramburu / Miriam Smolen vs Caroline Houston / Jodi Seth6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLynnita Montague-Daddio vs Monica Popp6-3, 6-3
2022-01-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesMiriam Smolen / Joyce Aramburu vs Amy King / Jodi Seth6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Carrie Fleming
published 3
2.87
Lynnita Montague-Daddio
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Marcy Davidson
published
2.46
Joyce Aramburu
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.45
Miriam Smolen
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.44
Amy Heuer
published 2.5
2.43
Karen Boulineaux
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Miriam Smolen + Joyce Aramburu91948% games−1.8% vs expected
Joyce Aramburu + Lynnita Montague-Daddio134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carrie Fleming
46W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Lynnita Montague-Daddio
108W–128L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.87
Marcy Davidson
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Joyce Aramburu
78W–180L career · type A · 14 lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
2.46
3
Miriam Smolen
49W–101L career · 9 lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.45
2.5
Amy Heuer
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
0%67%33%
2.44
Karen Boulineaux
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.