Teams

Cockrel/Nashville

2026 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-27vs Myers/Ivey/NashvilleSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMichelle Vandevier / Zena Krupin vs Gefi Ivey / Lisa Thompson6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKristen Martindale vs Nicole Covey4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLeslie Atchley / Jennifer Bonds vs Sabrina Below / Paige Glendinning6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRachel Chisolm / Mary Smith vs Courtney Sanders / Bridgett Garratt3-6, 4-6
2026-04-13vs Atkins/White/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesJennifer Bonds / Leslie Atchley vs Kathryn Hanson / Sara White7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKristen Martindale vs Lindsey Frye3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKerry Finley / Cara Ferguson vs Dana Atkins / Courtney Finn2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Jasarevski vs Ali mcclure3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRuth Harrison / Jennifer Cockrel vs Christine Holz / Irina Miller6-2, 7-6
2026-03-23vs Messer/NashvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesRuth Harrison / Elizabeth Jasarevski vs Beth Burns / Tonya Messer0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKristen Martindale vs Cornelia Vance3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLeslie Atchley / Jennifer Cockrel vs Tasha Freels / Shannon Sanford6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesChristy Carter vs Rebecca Moriarity4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Bonds / Cara Ferguson vs Terri Hagood / Ann Weggeman6-4, 7-5
2026-03-16vs Eftekhari/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Smith / Leslie Atchley vs Georgette Eftekhari / Caroline Nail3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristen Martindale vs Janie Berry6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRuth Harrison / Jennifer Cockrel vs Joey Nelson / Paige Menge7-5, 6-4
2026-03-09vs Burke/Wright/NashvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesKaren Ard / Christy Carter vs Helen Hopson / Caroline Bailey1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesClaudia Emfinger vs Nikki Turitto2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTraci Holloway / Mary Smith vs Libby Burke / Maggie Stockton5-7, 0-6
L#2 SinglesLeslie Atchley vs Alise Gregory4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRachel Chisolm / Jennifer Bissonnette vs Catherine Pattison / Emily Schell2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Jennifer Bonds
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Claudia Emfinger
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.89
Christy Sykes
published 3
2.89
Leslie Atchley
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.75
Christy Carter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.73
Kristen Martindale
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.65
Cara Ferguson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Kerry Finley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Ruth Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.57
Michelle Vandevier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Elizabeth Jasarevski
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.55
Zena Krupin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Jennifer Bissonnette
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Jennifer Cockrel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.38
Rachel Chisolm
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Traci Holloway
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Bonds + Leslie Atchley5361% games+4.8% vs expected
Ruth Harrison + Jennifer Cockrel2940% games−1.9% vs expected
Cara Ferguson + Christy Sykes134 matchesnot enough data
Kerry Finley + Claudia Emfinger123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Bonds
10W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Claudia Emfinger
4W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%24%
2.90
3
Christy Sykes
8W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Leslie Atchley
9W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Christy Carter
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.75
Kristen Martindale
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Cara Ferguson
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Kerry Finley
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Ruth Harrison
4W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Michelle Vandevier
1W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.57
Elizabeth Jasarevski
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
Zena Krupin
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Jennifer Bissonnette
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Jennifer Cockrel
6W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47
Rachel Chisolm
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.38
Traci Holloway
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.