Teams

Tyler-Whitus/Blair TASC

2025 40 & Over Little State · Ladies 4.0 Flight

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-07vs Austin-Match MakersLost 13
L#1 DoublesMartha Thompson / Jane Adams vs Kristine Grant / Karen Shields0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKathryn Glenn vs Jennifer Woster0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCamille Becton / Cindy Behm vs Sandy Arico / Karen Wilkins6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLauren Whitus / Chesle Blair vs Brenda Latta / Mary Anne Clement2-6, 2-6
2025-06-06vs Valley GirlsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLauren Whitus / Camille Becton vs Marisa Aguilar / Luz Cortes6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKathryn Glenn vs Beatriz Saenz6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMartha Thompson / Jane Adams vs Gina Crixell / Elizabeth Loveland6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChesle Blair / Traci Velvin vs Denise Kayani / Rachel Kram6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-06vs Corpus-Not My FaultSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCamille Becton / Cindy Behm vs Monica Salazar / Melinda Gonzales5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKathryn Glenn vs Karen Truesdell4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLauren Whitus / Chesle Blair vs Kimberly Arch / Lynn Platteborze2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJane Adams / Martha Thompson vs Paula Gerloff / Jeanie Szmanda1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 4.0 Flight have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Lauren Whitus
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Meg Robertson
published
3.76
Cindy Behm
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
Christina Li
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.74
Camille Becton
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.71
Callie Morton
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.43
Chesle Blair
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Shawna Tankersley
published
3.28
Traci Velvin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Judy Hooks
published
Kathryn Glenn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Martha Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Behm + Camille Becton8751% games−1.5% vs expected
Callie Morton + Lauren Whitus224 matchesnot enough data
Chesle Blair + Lauren Whitus123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Whitus
29W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Meg Robertson
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Cindy Behm
8W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Christina Li
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Camille Becton
14W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Callie Morton
33W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Chesle Blair
13W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.43
Shawna Tankersley
11W–18L career · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
Traci Velvin
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.28
Judy Hooks
2W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathryn Glenn
6W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Martha Thompson
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.