Teams

Serve It Up

2022 DC WTA Adult 18 & Over Spring · DC WTA Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-18vs Net AssetsWon 32
W#1 DoublesMatthew August / Andrew Park vs Michael Ratner / Russell Gossett6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKhoa Tran vs Nick Fox6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSamuel Fontanez / Mike Sweet vs Michael Wasser / Bradley Kesling5-7, 4-3
L#2 SinglesAli Sajadi vs ALBERT TENG1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSean Pruitt / Edward Naidich vs Mark Holt / Sharif Charles6-3, 6-2
2022-05-22vs Chip N ChargeLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrew Park / Majed Hamawy vs Christopher Graves / Laith Peter1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAli Sajadi vs Shawn Drury1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Levine / James Rowe vs Andy Bressler / Kevin Hudak7-6, 1-3
2022-05-21vs Net AssetsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKhoa Tran / Jason Pallady vs Asa Elkins / Michael Ratner5-6
L#1 SinglesAli Sajadi vs Nick Fox3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSamuel Fontanez / Mike Sweet vs Sharif Charles / Bradley Kesling6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEdward Naidich / Andrew Park vs Neil Shah / ALBERT TENG3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-05-15vs Chip N ChargeWon 32
L#1 DoublesPeter Levine / Mike Sweet vs Jason Olson / Laith Peter1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAli Sajadi vs Brian Lynch6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSean Pruitt / James Shevlin vs Fabrizio Cariani / Jeff Ragonese6-7, 3-5
W#2 SinglesKhoa Tran vs Travis Langenkamp6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJames Rowe / Samuel Ryan vs Kevin Hudak / Matthew Warren6-3, 4-4
2022-04-30vs Net AssetsWon 41
W#1 DoublesJason Pallady / Andrew Park vs ALBERT TENG / Michael Ratner6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKhoa Tran vs Tanzid Shams6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesEdward Naidich / Mike Sweet vs Michael Wasser / Russell Gossett1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAli Sajadi vs Bradley Kesling6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJames Shevlin / Sean Pruitt vs Keith Jacobs / Mark Holt3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-16vs Chip N ChargeWon 31
W#1 SinglesKhoa Tran vs Shawn Drury6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSamuel Fontanez / Andrew Park vs Eric Grace / Jeff Ragonese6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAli Sajadi vs Cameron Corday6-7, 3-3
W#3 DoublesSean Pruitt / Mike Sweet vs Brian Lynch / Matthew Warren6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2022-04-10vs Net AssetsLost 02
L#1 SinglesAli Sajadi vs Michael Wasser3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJames Shevlin / Mike Sweet vs Mark Holt / Neil Shah6-7, 4-5
2022-04-02vs Chip N ChargeLost 23
L#1 DoublesKhoa Tran / Jason Pallady vs Christopher Graves / Jeff Ragonese4-6, 6-5
L#1 SinglesAli Sajadi vs Andy Bressler4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAndrew Park / Samuel Fontanez vs Kevin Hudak / Travis Langenkamp6-7, 4-2
W#2 SinglesSean Pruitt vs Eric Grace7-6, 3-3
L#3 DoublesJames Rowe / James Shevlin vs Marc Schoeni / Matthew Warren0-6, 6-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for DC WTA Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Andrew Park
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Jason Pallady
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Khoa Tran
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Samuel Ryan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Samuel Fontanez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
James Rowe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Ali Sajadi
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 3.5
3.15
James Shevlin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.98
Majed Hamawy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Mike Sweet
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.91
Edward Naidich
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Peter Levine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sean Pruitt
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Sweet + Samuel Fontanez224 matchesnot enough data
Samuel Fontanez + Andrew Park404 matchesnot enough data
Jason Pallady + Khoa Tran224 matchesnot enough data
James Shevlin + Sean Pruitt224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Park
27W–4L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Jason Pallady
85W–62L career · 5 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Khoa Tran
29W–30L career · 6 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
Samuel Ryan
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Samuel Fontanez
71W–101L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
James Rowe
19W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Ali Sajadi
4W–15L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
James Shevlin
25W–26L career · 10 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
3
Majed Hamawy
379W–517L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%57%43%
2.98
Mike Sweet
7W–21L career · 6 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Edward Naidich
83W–74L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91
Peter Levine
9W–26L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sean Pruitt
15W–14L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.