Teams

ATC SCHMIDT

2025 Fall FW Ladies 50 & Over Social League · Monday Ladies 6.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-11-03vs TCU WEISSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichelle Fagan / Jane Schmidt vs Jo Anne Golaz / Diane Kleinman6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCass Weyandt / Andrea Sheldon vs Leah Ann Neal / Virginia Hatch6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-10-27vs TCU SCOTTLost 03
L#1 DoublesLynne Byars / Andrea Sheldon vs Maureen Doss / Denise Cardenas4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCass Weyandt / Mary Buffington vs Katherine Weeks / Gayle Hale6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRonda Lane / Nanette Commerford vs Linda Horner / Susie Gilinsky4-6, 2-6
2025-10-27vs MCL HULSEY/HOCHSTERWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Woody / Jane Schmidt vs LINDA FEATHERSTONE / Anne Ferguson6-1, 6-1
2025-10-20vs SOAKS ROTHERMELWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarole Green / Cass Weyandt vs Bonnie Sudderth / Pamela Williams1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLynne Byars / Cindy Aldrete vs Edith Alvarez / Angie Eddins6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMary Buffington / Nanette Commerford vs Misha Pfaff / Vickie Brannen6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-10-13vs TCU WEISSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichelle Fagan / Angie Eddins vs Kathleen Calder / Petra Townsend4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGayle Howington / Carole Green vs Pet Guerra / Kelly Dishman4-6, 4-6
2025-10-06vs TCU SCOTTLost 03
L#1 DoublesLynne Byars / Michelle Fagan vs Marsha Scott / Nancy Conner5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Sheldon / Cass Weyandt vs Sue Stuecheli / Tricia Spann4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGayle Howington / Cindy Aldrete vs Katherine Weeks / Denise Cardenas2-6, 6-7
2025-09-29vs SOAKS ROTHERMELLost 03
L#1 DoublesLynne Byars / Cass Weyandt vs Pamela Williams / Bonnie Sudderth3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarole Green / Nanette Commerford vs Jamie Wayland / Mary Ann Littleton2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGayle Howington / Mary Buffington vs Vickie Brannen / Misha Pfaff3-6, 0-6
2025-09-22vs TCU WEISWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Fagan / Lynne Byars vs Karol Fate / Virginia Hatch6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCarole Green / Cindy Aldrete vs Jo Anne Golaz / Diane Kleinman5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCass Weyandt / Mary Buffington vs Kathleen Calder / Kelly Dishman6-1, 6-1
2025-09-15vs TCU SCOTTLost 03
L#1 DoublesLynne Byars / Nanette Commerford vs Karen Neumann / Marsha Scott5-7, 0-3
L#2 DoublesRonda Lane / Angie Eddins vs Sue Stuecheli / Tricia Spann1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarole Green / Cass Weyandt vs Katherine Weeks / Maureen Doss7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-08vs SOAKS ROTHERMELLost 12
W#1 DoublesJane Schmidt / Michelle Fagan vs Pamela Williams / Jamie Wayland3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarole Green / Cindy Aldrete vs Angie Eddins / Mariann Billings3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNanette Commerford / Lynne Byars vs Edith Alvarez / Vickie Brannen4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Monday Ladies 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Jane Schmidt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Nanette Commerford
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.83
Cass Weyandt
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.77
Cindy Aldrete
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Angie Eddins
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.67
Carole Green
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.60
Ronda Lane
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Lynne Byars
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
2.56
Gayle Howington
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Andrea Sheldon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Buffington
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Michelle Fagan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynne Byars + Cass Weyandt1446% gamesnot enough data
Lynne Byars + Mary Buffington1433% gamesnot enough data
Jane Schmidt + Michelle Fagan4159% gamesnot enough data
Gayle Howington + Carole Green134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jane Schmidt
7W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.91
Nanette Commerford
13W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.89
3
Cass Weyandt
10W–25L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Cindy Aldrete
29W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Angie Eddins
17W–32L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Carole Green
7W–24L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.67
Ronda Lane
5W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.60
Lynne Byars
14W–22L career · 7 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Gayle Howington
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.56
Andrea Sheldon
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Buffington
8W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Fagan
11W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.