Teams

Heathrow-Flores

2025 ORANGESEMINOLE Adult 18 & Over - WINTER-Day · 5.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.86 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-12vs ORANGE/Auld/18&Over5.0wLost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Krueger / Pasha Baker vs Kaitlynn Groves / Lindsay Puder4-6, 2-6
2025-04-06vs ORANGE/Auld/18&Over5.0wLost 01
L#2 DoublesBithiah Segura-Castillo / Desirae McLaughlin vs Mimi Tran / Anne-Marie Miller0-6, 3-6
2025-03-30vs ORANGE/Auld/18&Over5.0wLost 02
L#1 SinglesPamela Saffran vs Kaitlynn Groves0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEllen Krueger / Ligia Bottinelli vs Bryn Auld / Anne-Marie Miller2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-03-09vs ORANGE/Auld/18&Over5.0wLost 01
L#1 SinglesDesirae McLaughlin vs Allison Colvin6-7, 4-6
2025-03-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCristina Brace / Ellen Krueger vs Tasi Purcell Batista / JoAnn Mokris2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.44 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.78
Gail Gibson
published 5
Chelcie Abajian
published 5
Itzel Sotorosa
published 5
4.59
Jodi Needleman
published
4.50
Andrea Flores
published 5
4.36
Desirae McLaughlin
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.34
Ligia Bottinelli
published
4.26
Ellen Krueger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.24
Pamela Saffran
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Pasha Baker
published
Patricia LaRovere
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Desirae McLaughlin + Ellen Krueger4653% games+3.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Gail Gibson
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
4.78
5
Bithiah Segura-Castillo
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Chelcie Abajian
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Itzel Sotorosa
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jodi Needleman
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
4.59
5
Andrea Flores
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
4.50
4.5
Desirae McLaughlin
70W–85L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
4.36
Ligia Bottinelli
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Ellen Krueger
43W–69L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
4.26
Pamela Saffran
67W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
98%2%<1%
4.24
Pasha Baker
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia LaRovere
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.