Teams

Canyon Creek/Robins M4.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S M. League

18 players · average NTRP 4.06 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-06-28vs LB Houston/Nader-Perumalla M4.0Lost 02
L#1 SinglesMARK HOPPER vs Paul Curtiss4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPete Smith / James Patterson vs Payne Spudic / Arvind Sinha3-6, 6-7
2025-06-21vs Samuell Grand/Watson M4.0Lost 01
L#2 SinglesAndrew Sumarsono vs Jonathan Goonan1-6, 1-6
2025-06-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesBen Henke / William Ragle vs Shivan Mehta / Jay Tatachar6-4, 6-3
2025-05-31vs Greenhill/Montalvo M4.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDaniel Robbins / Ben Henke vs Alberto Martinez / Cody Blanchard6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJames Patterson / Andrew Sumarsono vs Luis Munguia / Justin Brown3-6, 3-6
2025-05-17vs Gleneagles/Wolf M4.0Won 21
L#1 SinglesAndrew Sumarsono vs James Shukis3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesWilliam Ragle / Ben Henke vs Alan Rabinowitz / Chris Guibert6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesCarl Cotter / MARK HOPPER vs Matthew Roemer / Andrew Steyn6-3, 6-0
2025-05-10vs MacArthur HS/Shrivastava M4.0Split 11
L#2 SinglesAndrew Sumarsono vs Drew Kirby6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBen Henke / Jacob Davenport vs Guru Bala / Raj Movva6-1, 6-0
2025-05-03vs LifeTime Plano/Epperson-Nair M4.0Won 20
W#2 DoublesAndrew Sumarsono / James Patterson vs Charlie Epperson / Daniel Cornish6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBen Henke / William Ragle vs Sudhakaran Subramanian / Sanjay Mevada6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-04-12vs McKinney/Patel-Van Ham M4.0Won 20
W#2 SinglesAndrew Sumarsono vs Jacob Shelver6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJacob Davenport / Ben Henke vs Barry Nickerson / Shawn Hamilton6-2, 6-4
2025-04-05vs Seay/Hinterlong M4.0Split 11
L#2 SinglesAndrew Sumarsono vs Patrick Nicholas Staha0-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesWilliam Ragle / Clay Cohorn vs Marco Hernandez / Austin Ferguson6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S M. League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Daniel Robbins
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.92
Brien Davis
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.91
Joel Huff
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
3.83
Ben Henke
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.81
Anthony Boyer
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Andrew Sumarsono
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 4
Clay Cohorn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Carl Cotter
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Michael Belvin
usually #1 Singles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
3.59
Clark Red
published 4
3.51
Kevin Ryan
published
3.49
MARK HOPPER
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.49
Terry Leff
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Pete Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jacob Davenport
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
MAKOTO YASUDA
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Nick Ouimet
published
William Ragle
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pete Smith + Kevin Ryan2542% games+2.7% vs expected
Joel Huff + Daniel Robbins4552% gamesnot enough data
Brien Davis + Ben Henke4258% gamesnot enough data
Ben Henke + Jacob Davenport6066% gamesnot enough data
William Ragle + Ben Henke303 matchesnot enough data
William Ragle + Terry Leff123 matchesnot enough data
Joel Huff + Brien Davis303 matchesnot enough data
Michael Belvin + Terry Leff123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Robbins
11W–11L career · 16 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Brien Davis
15W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.92
Joel Huff
26W–10L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Ben Henke
16W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Anthony Boyer
10W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Andrew Sumarsono
3W–5L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Clay Cohorn
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Carl Cotter
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Michael Belvin
7W–15L career · 8 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Clark Red
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.59
Kevin Ryan
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
MARK HOPPER
9W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Terry Leff
3W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.49
Pete Smith
3W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.31
Jacob Davenport
17W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
MAKOTO YASUDA
7W–2L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nick Ouimet
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
William Ragle
9W–9L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.