Teams

SS-LGT GREEN

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-15vs KC-CC BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesTraci Henry / Jennifer Moeller vs Elizabeth Baesman / Amanda Mueller6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNancy Hogue / Maria Blakney vs Allison Rooney / Peggy Cooper3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Railey-Borchelt / Toni Lapp vs Cari Eversman / Kim Sandman2-6, 4-6
2024-07-08vs GR GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJane Lundwall / Eva Miller vs Abby Letourneau / Sydney Green7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTraci Henry vs Jamie Lauters4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Moeller / Toni Lapp vs Jera Sturgell / Kari Taylor6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Railey-Borchelt / Nancy Hogue vs Ashley Busch / Elizabeth Hahn6-0, 6-7, 0-1
2024-07-01vs CK BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesNancy Railey-Borchelt / Jennifer Moeller vs Cathy McFarland / Jeni Cuddie3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesToni Lapp vs Susan OBrien2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Hogue / Traci Henry vs Erika Thomas / Lynette Hosler6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaria Blakney / Jane Lundwall vs Lisa Fellows / Michelle Lucero6-3, 6-1
2024-06-24vs KC-CC NAVYLost 13
L#1 DoublesMaria Blakney / Jennifer Moeller vs Lori Galyk / Christine McElhinney5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTraci Henry vs Kaitlin Vellore3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEva Miller / Jane Lundwall vs Jenna Masiello / Judy Delzell6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesToni Lapp / Nancy Railey-Borchelt vs Sarah Carlson / Monica Sheehy6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2024-06-17vs LEBTC BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesNancy Railey-Borchelt / Eva Miller vs Kristi Snow / Alison Cargo6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesToni Lapp vs Amy Hansel6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMaria Blakney / Jane Lundwall vs Maggie Bronson / Alice Heerse6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNancy Hogue / Jennifer Moeller vs Mary LePino Butler / Tamara Rook6-0, 6-0
2024-06-10vs CCC PURPLEWon 31
W#1 DoublesMaria Blakney / Eva Miller vs Stacey Hicks / Melissa Penza6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesTraci Henry vs Erin Wiley4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Railey-Borchelt / Jennifer Moeller vs Claire Koran / Tonya Rasmussen6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesNancy Hogue / Toni Lapp vs Amy Leonard / Janette Wenger6-3, 7-5
2024-06-03vs PH BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesMaria Blakney / Jane Lundwall vs Brooke Fox / Teri Markle2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTraci Henry vs Kate Funk6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Railey-Borchelt / Jennifer Moeller vs Tara Wolfe / Sarah Wadsworth3-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SS-LGT BLUE6122615199
2SS-H RED52181027222
3HMTC YELLOW42121228223
4PRC GREEN43161227242
5RRTC RED43171127237
6CACM NAVY43151331242
7BP RED43151332247
8CK GREEN43151335296
9LVTA RED33111327215
10LTFC GREEN34101838263
11JCC BLUE25141434275
12MEA TEAL1571737247
13LAC RED1571739258
14SS-LGT GREEN1642451328

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Jennifer Moeller
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
2.79
Maria Blakney
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Traci Henry
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.54
Nancy Railey-Borchelt
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.51
Jane Lundwall
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.49
Nancy Hogue
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Eva Miller
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Toni Lapp
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Hogue + Nancy Railey-Borchelt1542% games−1.7% vs expected
Nancy Hogue + Traci Henry4249% games−4.3% vs expected
Jane Lundwall + Traci Henry3251% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Railey-Borchelt + Toni Lapp044 matchesnot enough data
Jane Lundwall + Nancy Hogue213 matchesnot enough data
Jane Lundwall + Maria Blakney213 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Hogue + Toni Lapp123 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Railey-Borchelt + Traci Henry123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Moeller
30W–10L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%65%34%
2.94
3
Maria Blakney
29W–66L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
Traci Henry
14W–21L career · 6 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Nancy Railey-Borchelt
45W–72L career · 7 lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
2.54
Jane Lundwall
20W–12L career · 5 lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
2.51
Nancy Hogue
21W–24L career · 5 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.49
Eva Miller
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Toni Lapp
3W–9L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.