Teams

SWooten (Charlotte Indoor)

2022 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-29vs DCarmazzi (Matthews Tennis Club)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Brooks / Susan Adams vs Debbie Carmazzi / Cathy Purvis3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGwynne Ravenel / Sharon Wooten vs Madeleine Glover / Shelley Brunker4-6, 6-7
2022-04-25vs LCunningham (Charlotte Indoor)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Watford / Sharon Wooten vs Sally Lowrance / Katherine Hargett6-4, 6-1
2022-04-04vs CHelms (Life Time)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSharon Wooten / Jane Royther vs Lee Page / Diane Hunter2-6, 4-6
2022-03-28Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJane Royther / Sharon Wooten vs Tracy Brading / Karen Schmit3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Adams / Tracy Brea vs Amy Nielsen / Mary Peterson1-6, 4-6
2022-03-07Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDonna Buchman / Sharon Wooten vs Teresa Rhyne / Kim Lanning6-7, 3-6
2022-02-28vs LCunningham (Charlotte Indoor)Won 10
W#3 DoublesSharon Wooten / Jane Royther vs Liza Branch / Sally Lowrance6-3, 7-5
2022-02-21Split 11
L#2 DoublesSusan Adams / Tracy Brea vs Sarah Murphy / Ellen Smith7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Brooks / Sharon Wooten vs Carolyn Butler / Marsha McCrory6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Tracy Brea
published
3.48
Sharon Wooten
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.48
Susan Adams
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Karen Watford
published
3.11
Donna Buchman
published 3.5
Jane Royther
published
Karen Brooks
published
Sandra Stowe
published
Terri Sanz
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christianne Coover
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tracy Brea
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Sharon Wooten
102W–80L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
3.48
Susan Adams
14W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
3.48
Karen Watford
29W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%21%
3.40
3.5
Donna Buchman
7W–25L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
Jane Royther
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Brooks
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandra Stowe
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Terri Sanz
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.