Teams

YMCA PRESIDIO 40AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-15vs CARMEL VAC 40AW3.5BWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmy Peinado / Maria Ramos vs Patricia Dealey / Barbara Ehrenpreis6-0, 6-3
W#1 DoublesJamie Bartell / Elizabeth Lougee vs Nicole Barker / Patricia Sheedy6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSarah Howard vs Annabelle Frankl2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Tasker / Feyna Oman vs Jessica Kaludis / Sara Singerman1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSonal Patel / Molly Shiels vs Karen Forsthoff / Mimi Wong5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesJoanna Brook / Ashley Hellyer vs Timmie Haskins / Mimi Wong4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Lougee vs Grace Chan7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Peinado / Sarah Howard vs Nina Kim / Colleen Sonneborn4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMegan Myers / Molly Shiels vs Karen Forsthoff / Lois Anne Indorf6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Hayley Burner
published
3.35
Elizabeth Lougee
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Jennifer Wilkoff
published
3.24
Mary Anderson
published
3.23
Ashley Hellyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Taemee Hur
published
3.18
Joanna Brook
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Amy Peinado
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Jamie Bartell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Robin Inaba
published
3.06
Molly Shiels
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Sarah Howard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.98
Megan Myers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Elizabeth Coryell
published
2.85
Melissa Mountain
published
2.84
Sonal Patel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Tasker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Feyna Oman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kristine Delagnes
published
Lisa Tornello
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Hellyer + Joanna Brook4838% games−0.8% vs expected
Sonal Patel + Robin Inaba134 matchesnot enough data
Sonal Patel + Megan Myers123 matchesnot enough data
Jamie Bartell + Ashley Hellyer033 matchesnot enough data
Jamie Bartell + Joanna Brook123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hayley Burner
13W–36L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Elizabeth Lougee
23W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Jennifer Wilkoff
12W–14L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Mary Anderson
25W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.24
3.5
Ashley Hellyer
20W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Taemee Hur
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Joanna Brook
14W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Amy Peinado
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Jamie Bartell
9W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Robin Inaba
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
Molly Shiels
13W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Sarah Howard
6W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.98
Megan Myers
9W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
Elizabeth Coryell
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
Melissa Mountain
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
2.85
Sonal Patel
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Elizabeth Tasker
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Feyna Oman
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kristine Delagnes
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Tornello
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.