Teams

TTC - Thomas

2025 Tuscaloosa USTA Adult Fall Weeknight 40&over · 3.0 Adult Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.75 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-12-04vs NRYC Sandras 40+ 3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBeth Thomas / Linda Lee vs Pasquale Tosyali / Ines de Urtubey4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSarah Baxter / Diana Torres vs Alison Phillips / Ciana Ortiguera1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRene Sheffield / Debra Burroughs vs Carol Mills / Jessica Cicatiello2-6, 4-6
2024-11-21vs NRYC Sandras 40+ 3.0Lost 13
L#1 DoublesLinda Lee / Rene Sheffield vs Ines de Urtubey / Susan Whitley4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCindy Gilmore vs Holly Collins6-4, 6-7
L#2 DoublesTricia Murphy / Lee Embry vs Melanie Higgins / Ciana Ortiguera0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDebra Burroughs / LoWanda James vs Alison Phillips / Pasquale Tosyali0-6, 0-6
2024-11-20vs NRYC Sandras 40+ 3.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesLinda Lee / Beth Thomas vs Brandi LaBresh / Ciana Ortiguera1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJenifer Spears / Lee Embry vs Alison Phillips / Susan Whitley6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJAMIE LAMBERT / Sarah Baxter vs Helen Lovell / Linda Canterbury6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-11-06vs NRYC Sandras 40+ 3.0Split 22
L#1 DoublesLee Embry / Beth Thomas vs Pasquale Tosyali / Jessica Cicatiello1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesCindy Gilmore vs Stanislava Chtarbanova1-1
L#2 DoublesJenifer Spears / Rene Sheffield vs Holly Collins / Ciana Ortiguera6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDebra Burroughs / Linda Lee vs Alison Phillips / Helen Lovell7-6, 7-6
2024-10-30vs NRYC Sandras 40+ 3.0Lost 04
L#1 DoublesDebra Burroughs / Diana Torres vs Ines de Urtubey / Ciana Ortiguera1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesLoWanda James vs Alison Phillips1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Lee / JAMIE LAMBERT vs Cari Sandras / Brandi LaBresh0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen Farmaer / Jenifer Spears vs Jessica Cicatiello / Linda Canterbury0-6, 6-7
2024-10-23vs NRYC Sandras 40+ 3.0Lost 04
L#1 DoublesCindy Gilmore / Sarah Baxter vs Brandi LaBresh / Ines de Urtubey3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJenifer Spears vs Pasquale Tosyali3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLee Embry / Beth Thomas vs Cari Sandras / Helen Lovell6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDebra Burroughs / Tricia Murphy vs Stanislava Chtarbanova / Jessica Cicatiello4-6, 1-6
2024-10-16vs NRYC Sandras 40+ 3.0Lost 13
L#1 DoublesJAMIE LAMBERT / Linda Lee vs Cari Sandras / Ines de Urtubey2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDiana Torres vs Ciana Ortiguera0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTricia Murphy / Jenifer Spears vs Alison Phillips / Jessica Cicatiello2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKathleen Farmaer / Rene Sheffield vs Helen Lovell / Linda Canterbury7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.41 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.61
Sarah Baxter
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.61
Rene Sheffield
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.60
Cindy Gilmore
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.55
Tricia Murphy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
JAMIE LAMBERT
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.41
Jenifer Spears
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.33
Lee Embry
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Diana Torres
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.22
LoWanda James
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.21
Debra Burroughs
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.05
Beth Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Kathleen Farmaer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Burroughs + Jenifer Spears1440% games+5.4% vs expected
Tricia Murphy + Jenifer Spears1448% games+1.1% vs expected
Tricia Murphy + Debra Burroughs044 matchesnot enough data
Tricia Murphy + Beth Thomas224 matchesnot enough data
Beth Thomas + Jenifer Spears404 matchesnot enough data
Tricia Murphy + JAMIE LAMBERT123 matchesnot enough data
Lee Embry + Beth Thomas033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Baxter
3W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Rene Sheffield
17W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
3
Cindy Gilmore
11W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60
Tricia Murphy
20W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%37%63%
2.55
JAMIE LAMBERT
11W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
Jenifer Spears
23W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.41
Lee Embry
2W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
2.33
2.5
Diana Torres
1W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
LoWanda James
3W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
3
Debra Burroughs
8W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.21
2.5
Beth Thomas
26W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Kathleen Farmaer
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.