Teams

PLEASANTON CM8.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 8.5

25 players · average NTRP 4.27 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-09-16vs LOS ALTOS GCC CM8.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesChandrasekar Sankaranarayanan / Jerome Pons vs Carlos Gonzalez / Michael Porter6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 24 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Eric Xu
published 4.5
4.32
Glenn Teixeira
published 4.5
4.29
Paul Liu
published
4.29
Caesar Ladion
published 4.5
4.28
4.26
Pierre Ladion
published
Dirk Geldenhuys
published 4.5
4.12
Jake Anderson
published 4.5
4.11
Dwayne Vakatini
published 4.5
4.06
Javier Lagarde
published
4.02
Steve Berry
published
4.00
Jeremy Famularcano
published
3.92
Jerome Pons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Mahesh Narayanan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.86
Dai Truong
published 4
3.82
Shang Liu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Ed Heacox
published 4
3.81
Anton Hofmann
published 4
3.81
Alexander Tain
published 4
3.74
Sam Li
published
3.69
Ram Subramanian
published
3.67
Walt Jefferson
published
3.63
Paul Kwon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
John Sines
published
3.54
Ed Chun
published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eric Xu
30W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
4.43
4.5
Glenn Teixeira
30W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
4.32
Paul Liu
27W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Caesar Ladion
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
4.29
Maverick S Maghirang
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.28
Pierre Ladion
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Dirk Geldenhuys
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Jake Anderson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.12
4.5
Dwayne Vakatini
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.11
Javier Lagarde
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.06
Steve Berry
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
Jeremy Famularcano
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
4.00
Jerome Pons
41W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.92
Mahesh Narayanan
24W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Dai Truong
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.86
Shang Liu
40W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Ed Heacox
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Anton Hofmann
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Alexander Tain
19W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Sam Li
16W–11L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
Ram Subramanian
15W–5L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Walt Jefferson
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.67
Paul Kwon
23W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.63
John Sines
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.63
4
Ed Chun
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.