Teams

Wood Ranch Dukes

2024 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Men 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.64 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-08vs North Ranch RacketeersLost 01
L#3 DoublesMel Johnson / Greg Siegel vs Bill Sutman / Ali Motamedi6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2024-11-02vs Las Posas RebelsWon 30
W#1 DoublesGaren Amirganian / Nick Wilsey vs Joe Sandrasagra / Danny Chairez6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLee Tsai / Burke Franklin vs Peter Lassen / Christopher Renteria6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMel Johnson / Greg Siegel vs Bengt Johansson / Paul Sagar6-2, 6-0
L#1 DoublesBurke Franklin / Garen Amirganian vs William Nonnemaker / Keith Lopaty6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2024-10-13vs Spanish Hills SmoothWon 20
W#2 DoublesGaren Amirganian / Lee Tsai vs Peter DiPasquale / Charlie Kimball6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Cox / Burke Franklin vs Scott Runyon / Micah Dickey6-2, 6-1
2024-09-29vs Mission Oaks WarriorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesGaren Amirganian / Burke Franklin vs Brian Colon / Henry Tai7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
David McFarland
published 4
3.53
Garen Amirganian
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.48
Matthew Guerrero
published
3.47
Burke Franklin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.31
Lee Tsai
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Eric Chaimberg
published 3.5
3.29
Greg Siegel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Mel Johnson
published
3.26
Rod Shimamoto
published
3.14
David Berkowitz
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Garen Amirganian + Lee Tsai191652% games−4.4% vs expected
Garen Amirganian + Greg Siegel11551% games−7.2% vs expected
Lee Tsai + Greg Siegel7262% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David McFarland
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.78
3.5
Garen Amirganian
217W–148L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.53
Matthew Guerrero
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.48
4
Burke Franklin
157W–97L career · 4 lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Lee Tsai
212W–155L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Eric Chaimberg
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Greg Siegel
173W–158L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.29
Mel Johnson
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Rod Shimamoto
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
David Berkowitz
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.