Teams

MITCHELL PK 18MX8.0A

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX8.0

22 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Kristine Tan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.12
Winnie Zhang
published
4.11
Christina Ling
published 4.5
4.04
Jenny Wang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.99
Jaewan Mun
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.97
Kotaro Kitagawa
published
3.96
Kuan Chang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Manasa Gadde
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.87
Jonathan Trinh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Arden Lee
published 4
3.78
Joany Gao
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.70
David Loi
published 4
3.60
Ashley Chang
published 3.5
3.49
Jiyun Hong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Louis Kim
published
3.38
Rina Tsujimoto
published
3.30
Derrick Contreras
published 3.5
3.02
Thu Dang
published
Kazumasa Takahashi
published
Mayumi Dojima
published
Ryan Orbs
published
Zachary Richard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonathan Trinh + Manasa Gadde123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristine Tan
18W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
Winnie Zhang
13W–25L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Christina Ling
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
4.11
Jenny Wang
19W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
38%62%<1%
4.04
Jaewan Mun
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.99
Kotaro Kitagawa
13W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
Kuan Chang
15W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.96
Manasa Gadde
7W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.90
Jonathan Trinh
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.87
4
Arden Lee
12W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Joany Gao
21W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.78
4
David Loi
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.70
3.5
Ashley Chang
19W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.60
Jiyun Hong
18W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
Louis Kim
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.40
Rina Tsujimoto
5W–23L career · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
3.38
3.5
Derrick Contreras
14W–19L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
Thu Dang
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.02
Kazumasa Takahashi
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mayumi Dojima
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Orbs
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Zachary Richard
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.