Teams

Kemon

2022 SVTA Adult 18 & Over Weekend Women · SVTA Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women WEEKEND

8 players · average NTRP 2.92 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-05vs Chestnut ForksLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoi Ruther / Karen Moorman-Wildman vs Desiree Wing / Susan Metcalfe3-6, 5-4
2022-05-21vs Chestnut ForksSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAmy Kemon vs Erin Clark6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJoi Ruther / Jian Wen vs Nancy Gatti / Jane Kim6-4, 5-6
2022-05-07vs Chestnut ForksLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoi Ruther / Amy Kemon vs Jane Kim / Gabrielle Huthoefer2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-04-24vs Chestnut ForksWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Kemon / Phyllis Corley vs Rose Haldeman / Susan Metcalfe6-1, 6-2
2022-04-10vs Chestnut ForksLost 01
L#1 SinglesJoi Ruther vs Gabrielle Huthoefer2-6, 0-6
2022-04-02vs Chestnut ForksLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Kemon / Melanie Parks vs Kristin Gibbs / Ashleigh Bartel2-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SVTA Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women WEEKEND have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

DUSTY LOCKHART
published 3.5
2.96
Phyllis Corley
published 3
2.95
Amy Kemon
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.68
Charlene Sloan
published 3
2.46
Janet Bailey
published
2.30
Frankie Smith
published 2.5
2.25
Joi Ruther
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
Jian Wen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Kemon + Phyllis Corley12364% games−1.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
DUSTY LOCKHART
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Phyllis Corley
141W–82L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Amy Kemon
89W–51L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Charlene Sloan
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
Janet Bailey
12W–12L career · no lines in 2022
0%63%37%
2.46
2.5
Frankie Smith
17W–12L career · no lines in 2022
0%94%6%
2.30
2.5
Joi Ruther
94W–122L career · 6 lines in 2022
0%97%3%
2.25
Jian Wen
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.