Teams

River Strand Jumping Beenes

2023 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Spring Weekday · 4.0 W Tuesday

11 players · average NTRP 3.92 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-05-30vs IslandWalk HurmanWon 21
W#1 DoublesKara Beene / Nancy Finman vs Connie Weiss / Lynn Inganamort6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKim Reiser / Judi Wilson vs Mary Schmitz / Jane Hurman6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSharyn Quiros / Valerie Grubbs vs Deanna Allard / Barbara Belanger3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-16vs LWN GillisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSharyn Quiros / Judi Wilson vs Mari-Ann Kucharek / Nichole Bontell6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLorraine Breidenstein / Leslie Adkins vs Wanda Gilbert / Susan Gillis2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-09vs Payne Park Wilson-SnyderLost 02
L#1 DoublesKara Beene / Nancy Finman vs Cindy Wilson-Snyder / Yvonne Ghilardi6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKim Reiser / Judi Wilson vs Lisa Klemeyer / Tanya Kelly6-7, 2-6
2023-05-02vs LWR EnglanderWon 20
W#1 DoublesKara Beene / Nancy Finman vs Angela Heck / Donna Dubinsky6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSharyn Quiros / Judi Wilson vs Hayley Englander / Sheila Sosa7-6, 6-3
2023-04-25vs Mission Valley MooneyWon 21
W#1 DoublesKara Beene / Nancy Finman vs Lori Clark / Angela Striffler-Pierre7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPenny Franklin / Lorraine Breidenstein vs Beatriz Orive / Linda Gibbs5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJudi Wilson / Sharyn Quiros vs Patricia Moriarty / Jennifer Jaworski6-4, 6-0
2023-04-21vs Laurel Oak...but did you win?Lost 12
L#1 DoublesHattie Grimsley / Sharyn Quiros vs Yudi Carpenter / Jacqueline VonKuhn2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLorraine Breidenstein / Judi Wilson vs Liz Taft / Cindi Gomez4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKara Beene / Nancy Finman vs Haven Beach / Leslie Jones6-3, 6-3
2023-04-18vs Payne Park No Drama MamasLost 02
L#1 DoublesKara Beene / Nancy Finman vs Susan Rakay / Lauren Wohlwend6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTeri Barnard / Sharyn Quiros vs Fabiola Beckmann / Tracy Mediratta5-7, 3-6
2023-04-11vs Sarasota/Nicholson/40&Over4.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesKara Beene / Nancy Finman vs Kanjana Thomas / Katie Emmons6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTeri Barnard / Sharyn Quiros vs Diana Stadelnikas / Elizabeth Goelz6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBernadette King / Lorraine Breidenstein vs Sandy Severs / Nia Esposito2-6, 4-6
2023-04-04vs Cedars Island GirlsLost 12
L#1 DoublesKara Beene / Nancy Finman vs Wendy Hillock / Vickie Miller1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesTeri Barnard / Sharyn Quiros vs Carrie Carretta / SueAnn Sanders1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesValerie Grubbs / Bernadette King vs Alison White / Michelle Coates6-7, 4-6
2023-03-28vs Plantation DipierroWon 21
W#1 DoublesKara Beene / Teri Barnard vs Kerry Distefano / Patricia Dipierro6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJudi Wilson / Nancy Finman vs Lesli Andrews / Janet Kramer6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSharyn Quiros / Valerie Grubbs vs Susie Lentile / Suyuan Mason6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Tuesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Kim Reiser
published 4
3.90
Kara Beene
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 4
3.87
Nancy Finman
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 4
3.74
Bernadette King
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Teri Barnard
published
3.69
Penny Franklin
published
3.66
Judi Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.46
Sharyn Quiros
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.43
Hattie Grimsley
published
Leslie Adkins
published
Lorraine Breidenstein
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Reiser + Nancy Finman7457% games+13.0% vs expected
Lorraine Breidenstein + Judi Wilson131152% games+10.2% vs expected
Judi Wilson + Sharyn Quiros232151% games+6.2% vs expected
Kim Reiser + Kara Beene4552% games+4.4% vs expected
Kim Reiser + Judi Wilson16853% games+0.2% vs expected
Kara Beene + Nancy Finman705552% games−2.4% vs expected
Penny Franklin + Nancy Finman4648% games−2.5% vs expected
Bernadette King + Judi Wilson101149% games−7.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kim Reiser
105W–66L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Kara Beene
240W–153L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.90
4
Nancy Finman
138W–95L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Bernadette King
50W–58L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.74
Teri Barnard
46W–21L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
Penny Franklin
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Judi Wilson
135W–101L career · 7 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
3.5
Sharyn Quiros
96W–91L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.46
Hattie Grimsley
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
3.43
Leslie Adkins
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lorraine Breidenstein
101W–147L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.