Teams

SS-LT BLUE

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-18vs PRC GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesLaurien Hottman / Rhea McMahon vs Julie Hernandez / Wendy Mathewson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTracy Mohrman vs Carrie del Toro6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKelly Crawley / Sarah Nelson vs Lisa Rosen / Julie Heck5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiana Nice / Tanya Koch vs Franny Schmidt / Henriette Nash6-2, 6-1
2024-07-15vs CPV BLUEWon 31
L#1 DoublesLaurien Hottman / Tanya Koch vs Liz Bauer / Samantha Hanson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesStephanie Fry vs Susan Boerema6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Crawley / Sarah Nelson vs Carol Lail / Anthea Gerberg6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTracy Mohrman / Rhea McMahon vs Susan Miles / PAULA GILBERT6-0, 6-0
2024-07-11vs GAC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Crawley / Laurien Hottman vs Debra Benge / Elizabeth Lord6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTracy Mohrman / Rhea McMahon vs Aimee Goodrich / Tracy Powers6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCynthia Clifford / Diana Nice vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-27vs PCRK BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesRhea McMahon / Laurien Hottman vs Jacque Montgomery / Gina Roth6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesStephanie Fry vs Stacy Cieraszynski6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKristina Schomer / Sarah Nelson vs Belinda Halfmann / Kathryn Ague3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCynthia Clifford / Diana Nice vs Pamela Smith / Juli Reiakvam6-3, 7-5
2024-06-20vs HRCA-S GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesLaurien Hottman / Rhea McMahon vs Kathy Dudek / Nantida Hong2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesStephanie Fry vs Becky Nemec7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDiana Nice / Tracy Mohrman vs Kimberly Bevill / Leann Penland7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKelly Crawley / Tanya Koch vs Stacey Miller / Elise Marks-Gruitch4-6, 5-7
2024-06-13vs PRC NAVYWon 21
L#1 DoublesRhea McMahon / Cynthia Clifford vs Donna Chan / Bridget Moreno3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTanya Koch / Laurien Hottman vs Elizabeth Anderson / Heidi Kelly6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKelly Crawley / Sarah Nelson vs Georgina Swales / Jennifer Benson6-1, 7-6
2024-06-06vs RRTC REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesKelly Crawley / Sarah Nelson vs Samantha Downing / Maureen Breitenbach3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesStephanie Fry vs Chrysie Ready6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLaurien Hottman / Tanya Koch vs Katy Adler / Kimberly Parks6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRhea McMahon / Cynthia Clifford vs Vida Melvin / Patricia Nowlan6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Laurien Hottman
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.65
Kelly Crawley
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Tracy Mohrman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.53
Rhea McMahon
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.37
Tanya Koch
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.29
Cynthia Clifford
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Stephanie Fry
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.93
Diana Nice
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Kristina Schomer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Crawley + Cynthia Clifford11167% games+12.9% vs expected
Tracy Mohrman + Rhea McMahon5165% games+10.4% vs expected
Tanya Koch + Kelly Crawley13461% games+8.8% vs expected
Stephanie Fry + Rhea McMahon13359% games+7.5% vs expected
Tanya Koch + Laurien Hottman7164% games+7.4% vs expected
Tracy Mohrman + Kelly Crawley251355% games+4.5% vs expected
Laurien Hottman + Kelly Crawley11261% games+3.5% vs expected
Laurien Hottman + Rhea McMahon441658% games+1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Laurien Hottman
175W–49L career · 7 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Kelly Crawley
137W–52L career · 6 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.65
3.5
Tracy Mohrman
95W–46L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%15%85%
3.63
3.5
Rhea McMahon
135W–41L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.53
Tanya Koch
55W–19L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Cynthia Clifford
56W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
Stephanie Fry
90W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Diana Nice
66W–126L career · 4 lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
2.93
Kristina Schomer
39W–11L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.