Teams

SDNC 4.5 Kit Carson Park (2:2)/ Jaehnig

2023 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SDNC WE · SDNC

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-26vs SDNC 4.5 Morgan Run (2:2)/ GlancyWon 10
W#1 DoublesBernie Buggs / Marc Roest vs Craig Bramlett / John Glancy6-1, 6-3
2023-03-19vs SDNC 4.5 RPTC (2:2)/ IshiharaWon 20
W#1 DoublesBernie Buggs / Jeffrey Ford vs Andrew Mikschl / Shimul Chowdhury6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesT Solomon Liu / David Jaehnig vs Jeffrey Ackley / Jeff Speir6-2, 6-1
2023-03-05vs SD 4.5 Balboa TC (3:1)/ GalanWon 20
W#1 DoublesBernie Buggs / Jeffrey Ford vs Roberto Ancira / Casey Moore6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChad Basinger / David Jaehnig vs Jed Galan / Joseph Barraquio7-6, 6-2
2023-02-19vs SD LLW 4.5 University City RC/ HwangSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBernie Buggs / Marc Roest vs Norman Granger / Raymund Ypon6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDavid Jaehnig / T Solomon Liu vs Antonio Padilla / Rodger Siordia6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesBernie Buggs / Jeffrey Ford vs Chris Fromme / James Lievers3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 DoublesBernie Buggs / Jeffrey Ford vs Grant Watkins / Anthony Cooper2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Jaehnig / Robert Bryant vs Kevin Pegels / James Koontz6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesBernie Buggs / Jeffrey Ford vs Kenny Hawkins / Jerry Lu6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
ALEXANDRE COLAS
published 4.5
4.40
Bernie Buggs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Chad Basinger
published 4.5
4.01
David Jaehnig
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.92
Don Hosch
published 4.5
Jeffrey Ford
published
John Graber
published
Robert Bryant
published
T Solomon Liu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chad Basinger + John Graber123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
ALEXANDRE COLAS
15W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
4.42
4.5
Bernie Buggs
155W–51L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
4.40
4.5
Chad Basinger
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
David Jaehnig
56W–42L career · 4 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
4.01
4.5
Don Hosch
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
3.92
Jeffrey Ford
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
John Graber
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Bryant
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
T Solomon Liu
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.