Teams

Fee - Edwards

2025 Brevard Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-02-28vs Brevard/Lowe/55&Over7.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesGena Wools / Iliana Bleau vs Jeannette Cintron / Kim Johnson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-21vs Brevard/Lowe/55&Over7.0WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesIliana Bleau / Char Lindsay vs Lori Abbott / Gisela Alcalde7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGena Wools / Frances Verolla vs Maggie Gu / Xu Sue Huang6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-02-14vs Brevard/Lowe/55&Over7.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesSandra Edwards / Iliana Bleau vs Jeannette Cintron / Michelle Winterich6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-02-07vs Brevard/Lowe/55&Over7.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesGena Wools / Char Lindsay vs Jeannette Cintron / Peggy Wilson3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesIliana Bleau / Susan Deschaine vs Susan Douglas / Kim Johnson1-6, 2-6
2025-01-31vs Brevard/Lowe/55&Over7.0WSplit 11
L#2 DoublesChar Lindsay / Gena Wools vs Lori Abbott / Susan Douglas2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesIliana Bleau / Catherine Grainger vs Kim Johnson / Lynne Schettino-DeFelice7-5, 7-5
2025-01-24vs Brevard/Lowe/55&Over7.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesChar Lindsay / Gena Wools vs Lori Abbott / Gisela Alcalde7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Deschaine / Iliana Bleau vs Lyuda Saks / Xu Sue Huang6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSandra Edwards / Kimberly Kressler vs Linda Carrillo / Ligia Moss2-6, 2-6
2025-01-17vs Brevard/Lowe/55&Over7.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesSandra Edwards / Gena Wools vs Maggie Gu / Xu Sue Huang6-7, 2-6
2025-01-10vs Brevard/Lowe/55&Over7.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesKimberly Kressler / Tonya Cary vs Lori Abbott / Peggy Wilson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChar Lindsay / Gena Wools vs Kim Johnson / Lyuda Saks4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Iliana Bleau
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Gena Wools
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.23
Catherine Grainger
published 3.5
3.18
Kimberly Kressler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Char Lindsay
published 3.5
3.09
Sandra Edwards
published
2.80
Karen Lee
published
Susan Deschaine
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Iliana Bleau
109W–93L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Gena Wools
29W–60L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Catherine Grainger
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Kimberly Kressler
70W–76L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Char Lindsay
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
Sandra Edwards
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
Karen Lee
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.80
Susan Deschaine
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.