Teams

Shokes/Fuller/CCC/Foothills

2023 Foothills Combo Doubles - 40 & over · 6.5 Combo Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-05Won 20
W#1 DoublesSondra Simmons / Denise Moose vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Shokes / Kelli Schmidt vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-28vs Diamonti/LHCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarson Helsper / DEBORAH OBERLE vs Andrea Banks / Wendy Walker7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelli Schmidt / Karen Shokes vs Theresa Huggins / Mindy Bolick5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-09-14vs Miller/HCP/FoothillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesSondra Simmons / Denise Moose vs Nancy James / Jennifer Dufour6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesOlivia Good / Carson Helsper vs Julie Wilson / Estera Biscos6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-09-07vs Diamonti/LHCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelli Schmidt / Karen Shokes vs Jennifer East / Kristine Hutton6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDenise Moose / Shannon Fuller vs Theresa Huggins / Angie Aycock6-2, 6-2
2023-08-31vs Kim/RBCC/FoothillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesSondra Simmons / Kelli Schmidt vs Maile Kim / Courtney Haan3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarson Helsper / Olivia Good vs Mitzi Arrowood / Susan Knowles4-6, 6-7
2023-08-24vs Miller/HCP/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Shokes / Kelli Schmidt vs Cori Peters / Ellen Stupka7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSondra Simmons / Denise Moose vs Kelly Miller / Natalie von Allmen6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Kelli Schmidt
published
3.45
Carson Helsper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Elise Wright
published 3.5
3.17
Karen Shokes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Sondra Simmons
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.08
Denise Moose
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.67
Maria Sherrill
published
2.66
Olivia Good
published
2.61
DEBORAH OBERLE
published 3
Rhonda Laxton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Moose + Sondra Simmons41042% games−8.9% vs expected
Karen Shokes + Sondra Simmons1536% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelli Schmidt
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
3.5
Carson Helsper
144W–110L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Elise Wright
14W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Karen Shokes
176W–86L career · 4 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Sondra Simmons
157W–103L career · 8 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Denise Moose
52W–62L career · 4 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.08
Maria Sherrill
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
2.67
Olivia Good
9W–13L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
DEBORAH OBERLE
3W–16L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.61
Rhonda Laxton
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.