Teams

Fernandez/40/7.5/CWD/UC

2023 BR Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Day · 7.5 BR (40&O) Women Day

16 players · average NTRP 3.81 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.5 BR (40&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Courtney McGraw
published 4
3.89
Tina Moore
published
3.78
Becky Davis
published 4
3.75
3.72
Allison Rovira
published 4
3.68
Lisa Marie Raiford
published
3.64
Dana Lanoix
published 4
3.58
Mindy Lovell
published
3.58
Lori Kinchen
published
3.49
Laurie Linehan
published
3.46
Hollie Easterling
published 3.5
3.43
Kristine Jones
published
3.42
Cherie Favaro
published 3.5
3.33
Leslie Fernandez
published
3.29
Alletia Sellers
published 3.5
3.22
Leanne Palma
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Linehan + Becky Davis6254% games+3.5% vs expected
Tina Moore + Becky Davis10457% games+2.2% vs expected
Dana Lanoix + Lori Kinchen5255% games−0.8% vs expected
Dana Lanoix + Becky Davis8455% games−1.0% vs expected
Tina Moore + Allison Rovira3348% games−8.3% vs expected
Cherie Favaro + Alletia Sellers1446% gamesnot enough data
Allison Rovira + Jackie Westerfield404 matchesnot enough data
Dana Lanoix + Tina Moore213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Courtney McGraw
51W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.90
Tina Moore
50W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Becky Davis
44W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Jackie Westerfield
34W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Allison Rovira
40W–23L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.72
Lisa Marie Raiford
65W–88L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Dana Lanoix
30W–22L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.64
Mindy Lovell
27W–21L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.58
Lori Kinchen
53W–24L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.58
Laurie Linehan
56W–35L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Hollie Easterling
68W–36L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
Kristine Jones
22W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Cherie Favaro
52W–50L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
Leslie Fernandez
6W–20L career · no lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
3.33
3.5
Alletia Sellers
33W–34L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
Leanne Palma
26W–24L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.