Teams

OVP/Morse

2025 COTA USTA Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women - Spring · Womens Day 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-27vs ACC/GadlinLost 05
L#1 DoublesJen Cole / Kristi Rivas vs Cristina Carrigan / Katherine Maxey4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesHeather Morse vs Amanda Newquist6-2, 0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKasey Dillard / Amanda White vs Emily Rose Terrell / Carolyn Morgan1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Smith / Kelly Wiedower vs Katie Pryor / Emily Scruggs6-2, 4-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesAllison March / Jessica Crocker vs Ginger Hriczo / Lisa Shirreffs1-6, 1-6
2025-02-26vs COTA/Ellyn LoganSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJen Cole / Ann Siegel vs Carlyn Jones / Ellyn Logan2-6, 6-3, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKristi Rivas / Kelly Wiedower vs Meghan Imrie / Kristen Hill6-4, 4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCathy Allen / Heather Morse vs Ashley Culberson / Jennifer Vaughan4-6, 7-6, 6-4
W#4 DoublesKasey Dillard / Amy Norris vs Amanda Lomonaco / Ashley Smith6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens Day 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Amy Norris
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Eleanor Patterson
published
2.75
Heather Morse
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Cathy Allen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Kristi Rivas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Ann Siegel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Kasey Dillard
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Allison March
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Jen Cole
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.13
Jessica Crocker
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly Wiedower
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jen Cole + Kasey Dillard3251% gamesnot enough data
Heather Morse + Kasey Dillard033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amy Norris
16W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Eleanor Patterson
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Heather Morse
12W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Cathy Allen
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kristi Rivas
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Ann Siegel
28W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
Kasey Dillard
32W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Allison March
7W–4L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
Jen Cole
23W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Jessica Crocker
3W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.13
Kelly Wiedower
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.