Teams

SDNC 3.5WD The Slice Girls @SDTC/ Evers

2025 SoCal Fall Doubles- SDNC WD Holiday · SDNC - Women- 3.5 (Wed

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-12vs SDNC 3.5WD FalalalaLomas/ GoodeLost 01
L#2 DoublesRoseann Mirsaidi / Jill Narlock vs Jennifer Kim / Heather Kowieski2-6, 1-6
2025-12-08vs SDNC 3.5WD FRCC/ VoeffrayWon 10
W#1 DoublesRoseann Mirsaidi / Pamela Sanford vs Alison Pasiut / Junli Feng6-4, 6-2
2025-12-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesMargot Aiken / Roseann Mirsaidi vs Eleana Campbell / Kelly Hopper6-0, 6-1
L#1 DoublesSusan Thorsell / Judy Baron vs Ana Mariela Gamiz / Carrie Musicant2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSamantha Cook / Roseann Mirsaidi vs Naomi Gallego / Irene Steinwinder3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Evers / Judy Baron vs Sarah Fontana / Sheila Birtsas2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesKimberly Evers / Roseann Mirsaidi vs Lori Lovering / Helen Farr2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJudy Baron / Margot Aiken vs Katie Butler / April Wise1-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesPamela Sanford / Roseann Mirsaidi vs Staci Fournier / Tricia Bothmer6-4, 6-3
L#1 DoublesJudy Baron / Roseann Mirsaidi vs Lisa Scala / Wynn Austin1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women- 3.5 (Wed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Kimberly Evers
published
3.31
Samantha Cook
published
3.25
Laura Kimball
published
3.25
Judy Baron
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Margot Aiken
published 3.5
3.14
Heidi Ullrich
published
3.11
Susan Thorsell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Debby Latterich
published 3.5
2.91
Roseann Mirsaidi
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy Baron + Margot Aiken0925% gamesnot enough data
Judy Baron + Susan Thorsell2443% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Ullrich + Laura Kimball123 matchesnot enough data
Debby Latterich + Laura Kimball033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Evers
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Samantha Cook
26W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Laura Kimball
14W–21L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Judy Baron
7W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Margot Aiken
5W–43L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Heidi Ullrich
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Susan Thorsell
17W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Debby Latterich
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Roseann Mirsaidi
22W–46L career · 7 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.