Teams

VC PINK

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-19vs DTP GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesEmily Stamatis / Caitlin Johnson vs Pauline Shaffer / Elizabeth Tandler4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesStasia Walker vs Michelle Virta2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMaritt Bird / Whitney Lancaster vs Alicia Henry / Ruth Armbruster0-6, 1-6
2026-08-12vs WP PURPLELost 03
L#1 DoublesAnna Reed / Marcie Haley vs Cece Carrico / Carmen Hart3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesStasia Walker vs Alyssa Beard0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesWhitney Lancaster / Maritt Bird vs Natalie Levanway / Makiala Davids0-6, 1-6
2026-08-05vs CHCC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesCaitlin Johnson / Emily Stamatis vs Zoe Williams / Kelly Brown1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesStasia Walker vs Emily Olson1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMarcie Haley / Rebecca Jones vs Sinead McGuire / Monica Zakovich4-6, 1-6
2026-07-29vs GCC PINKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCaitlin Johnson / Anna Reed vs Sarah Domareck / Deb Ridenour6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSimrall Kelley vs Danora Gotto0-6, 0-6
2026-07-22vs GAC GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarcie Haley / Rebecca Jones vs Jessica Foster / Lauren Lesnoy1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSimrall Kelley vs Carrie Laker4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesStasia Walker / Emily Stamatis vs Caroline Simpson / Jenny York2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.00 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.24
Kristin Pietsch
published
2.17
Emily Stamatis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.16
Caitlin Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.04
Stasia Walker
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
1.76
Simrall Kelley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
1.64
Marcie Haley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Erin Baker
published
Maritt Bird
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Whitney Lancaster
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Stamatis + Caitlin Johnson6745% games+2.5% vs expected
Marcie Haley + Simrall Kelley044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Pietsch
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Emily Stamatis
6W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Caitlin Johnson
8W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
Stasia Walker
1W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Simrall Kelley
0W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.76
Marcie Haley
0W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.64
Erin Baker
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Maritt Bird
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Whitney Lancaster
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.