Teams

Ke.Hurter18C2.5

2024 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.57 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-09vs De.Farmer18C2.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesErica Mobley / Angela McGee vs Erika Barcliff / Taqiyya Yasin4-6, 0-6
2024-10-07vs La.McRee18CWon 10
W#2 DoublesJulia Hughes / Kelly Hurter vs AMY KOCH / Mary Evans6-2, 6-1
2024-09-23vs Cl.Duff18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesKelly Hurter / Angela McGee vs Claire Duff / Meredith Piper3-6, 4-6
2024-09-16vs St.Fogarty18C2.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMeagan Moore / Angela McGee vs Amanda Brandon / Stephanie Fogarty6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-09-09vs Ke.Blevins18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesKelly Hurter / Angela McGee vs Kelly Blevins / Vina Jordano5-7, 3-6
2024-09-08vs La.McRee18CLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Cantando / Angela McGee vs AMY KOCH / Kristen Duke7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKelly Hurter / Kathleen Lalor vs Kristen Harris / Melissa Pereira3-6, 4-6
2024-08-19vs Cl.Duff18CWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Cantando / Angela McGee vs Margaret Ann Kleisch / Meredith Piper7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKelly Hurter / Julia Hughes vs Katie Clayton / Charlotte Mercer6-2, 6-2
2024-08-05vs Ke.Blevins18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesAngela McGee / Nina Schweitzer vs Kay Bonavita / Casey Novak2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Julia Hughes
published
2.89
Amy Cantando
published 3
2.74
Megan Oneill
published
2.67
Angela McGee
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
2.62
Kelly Hurter
usually #2 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 2.5
2.56
Allison Bubar
published 2.5
2.49
Meagan Moore
published
2.24
Nina Schweitzer
published
2.21
Debi Booker
published 2.5
2.11
Erica Mobley
published 2.5
2.02
Gina Hardy
published 2.5
Rebecca Harris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela McGee + Kelly Hurter8260% games+10.7% vs expected
Julia Hughes + Kelly Hurter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julia Hughes
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Amy Cantando
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.89
Megan Oneill
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
2.5
Angela McGee
47W–45L career · 7 lines in 2024
0%10%90%
2.67
2.5
Kelly Hurter
54W–30L career · 9 lines in 2024
0%19%81%
2.62
2.5
Allison Bubar
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%31%69%
2.56
Meagan Moore
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%53%47%
2.49
Nina Schweitzer
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Debi Booker
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.21
2.5
Erica Mobley
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.11
2.5
Gina Hardy
2W–17L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Rebecca Harris
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.