Teams

LHNY-Nyquist/jETTON 7.5 55

2025 Lake Combo Doubles 55 & Over · 7.5 Women 55s

14 players · average NTRP 3.61 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-15vs LSOS-OSTAPKO/SKYBROOKWon 20
W#1 DoublesNathalie Naslund / Jill Sullivan-Keating vs Julie Bosley / Julie Phillips6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMargaret Vermillion / Heather MacFadyen vs Bonnie Chen / Shumbriar Ostapko6-3, 6-3
2025-10-08vs LLAL-Altamura/PeninsulaWon 21
W#1 DoublesNathalie Naslund / Jill Sullivan-Keating vs Maryann Bruce / Sheila Wakeman6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMary Beth Thomas / Cindy Houser vs Alison Siebold / Laura Engel3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMargaret Vermillion / Heather MacFadyen vs Lois Reynolds / Sharon McAfee6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-01vs LEFO-Foreman-Ray/NMPWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Hallman / Cindy Japec vs Elizabeth Foreman / Karen Ray4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Davis / Kathleen Rissberger vs Anna Bonham / Nancy Zylstra6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesErika Buchholz / Jill Sullivan-Keating vs Debbie Beam / Anita Honeycutt7-5, 6-1
2025-09-24Won 20
W#1 DoublesKathleen Rissberger / Karen Hallman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesHeather MacFadyen / Margaret Vermillion vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-10vs LVWE-Weber/Westport 55 7.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesJill Sullivan-Keating / Nathalie Naslund vs Kathy Buaron / Jennie Carruth7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Davis / Cindy Japec vs Elizabeth Krogstie / Crystal Regan6-3, 6-4
2025-09-03vs LBKO-Kosior/CRPLost 03
L#1 DoublesNathalie Naslund / Lori Anne Emlong vs Carolyn Peacock / Barbara Kosior2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Vermillion / Cindy Houser vs Jane Heredia / Elana Fedor6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Davis / Kathleen Rissberger vs Karen Allison / Filomena Ferri3-6, 1-6
2025-08-27vs LSOS-OSTAPKO/SKYBROOKWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Hallman / Cindy Japec vs Leta Wiley / Jane Rodewald5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLori Anne Emlong / Nathalie Naslund vs Katherine Dugan / Julie Phillips6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKathleen Rissberger / Suzanne Davis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-20vs LLAL-Altamura/PeninsulaSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMegan Hartley / Nathalie Naslund vs Sharon McAfee / Alison Siebold7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesHeidi Nyquist / Mary Beth Thomas vs Ann Modlin / Lois Reynolds6-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women 55s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Nathalie Naslund
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Karen Hallman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Margaret Vermillion
published
3.52
Megan Hartley
published
3.47
Erika Buchholz
published
3.44
Cindy Japec
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Dina White
published
3.41
Lori Anne Emlong
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.41
Mary Beth Thomas
published
3.40
Jill Sullivan-Keating
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Kathleen Rissberger
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.23
Cindy Houser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Heidi Nyquist
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Heather MacFadyen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Nyquist + Heather MacFadyen171254% games+8.1% vs expected
Heidi Nyquist + Cindy Japec9554% games+2.9% vs expected
Karen Hallman + Cindy Japec6250% games+1.5% vs expected
Nathalie Naslund + Jill Sullivan-Keating6361% games−2.8% vs expected
Lori Anne Emlong + Heather MacFadyen5253% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Rissberger + Heather MacFadyen3448% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Japec + Heather MacFadyen2346% gamesnot enough data
Margaret Vermillion + Dina White224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Nathalie Naslund
86W–53L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Karen Hallman
106W–82L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Margaret Vermillion
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
Megan Hartley
17W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Erika Buchholz
14W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Cindy Japec
240W–219L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Dina White
19W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Lori Anne Emlong
131W–83L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Mary Beth Thomas
0W–10L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.41
3.5
Jill Sullivan-Keating
134W–69L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Kathleen Rissberger
188W–100L career · type A · 7 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Cindy Houser
73W–56L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Heidi Nyquist
129W–151L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Heather MacFadyen
118W–128L career · type A · 8 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.