Teams

Net Results

2022 Fredericksburg Tri-Level 18 & Over · Fredericksburg Tri-Level Women 4.0,3.5,3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.43 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-12-10vs Battlefield Ball BustersWon 10
W#2 DoublesTanya Gossett / Cynthia Robinson vs Susan Hanback / Debbie Kem6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2022-11-07vs Sip and ServeLost 01
L#2 DoublesSabra Szczyglowski / Judith Jobrack vs Telly Salafia / Lana King4-6, 2-6
2022-10-30Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCarlene Gordon / Tanya Gossett vs Hisami Bergeron / Maggie van Zandt1-6, 4-6
2022-10-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy French / Katie Leimbach vs Alexandra Brewster / Cynthia Goforth2-6, 1-6
2022-10-17vs Sip and ServeLost 02
L#1 DoublesKatie Leimbach / Nancy Siems vs Cynthia Goforth / Alexandra Brewster6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJudith Jobrack / Sabra Szczyglowski vs Maggie van Zandt / Telly Salafia5-7, 1-6
2022-10-16Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJudith Jobrack / Lorrie Roberts vs Elaine Brissette / Susan Hanback4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-10-02vs Battlefield Ball BustersLost 01
L#2 DoublesTanya Gossett / Sabra Szczyglowski vs Elaine Brissette / Lisa Palmer3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Tri-Level Women 4.0,3.5,3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Katie Leimbach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Amy French
published 4
3.65
Ariel Selwyn
published 4
3.36
Tanya Gossett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Julie Root
published
3.36
Nikki Hyldahl
published
3.27
Lorrie Roberts
published
3.06
Cynthia Robinson
published 3.5
2.93
Sabra Szczyglowski
published
Amara Halt
published 3
Carlene Gordon
published 3
2.73
Judith Jobrack
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Jennifer Isham
published
Nancy Siems
published
Teresa Stone
published
Tracey Nankivel
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Leimbach
28W–48L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Amy French
6W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Ariel Selwyn
7W–16L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
3.5
Tanya Gossett
39W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Julie Root
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Nikki Hyldahl
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Lorrie Roberts
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Cynthia Robinson
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
Sabra Szczyglowski
32W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
2.93
3
Amara Halt
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Carlene Gordon
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Judith Jobrack
72W–90L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Jennifer Isham
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.71
Nancy Siems
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Teresa Stone
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tracey Nankivel
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.