Teams

3.TOC.Mulcahy

2022 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.07 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-28vs 4.CAS.DeAngelisLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristine Dukiet / Kelli Leonard vs Jennifer Kuzma / Joanne Kearney7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTiffani Campbell vs Stayce Key0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Dusina / Megan Richardson vs Colleen Moody / Katrina KUCZYNSKI4-6, 2-6
2022-04-21vs 5.APEX.TandradinataLost 03
L#1 SinglesCyndy Fettig vs Rose Trimpey-Warhaftig6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichele Mulcahy / Christine Dukiet vs Sue Sheldon / Stephannie Messina1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLori Jee / Susan Keen vs Nancy Findley / Jesse Shoemaker-Ramsey2-6, 2-6
2022-04-07vs 1.APEX.HinckleyWon 30
W#1 DoublesCyndy Fettig / Lori Jee vs Michelle Chiaramonte / Sheri Lieffrig6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAndrea Dusina vs Jeannine McClung6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTiffani Campbell / Becky Briggs vs Elizabeth Enderline / Joanne Cooling6-4, 6-0
2022-03-31vs 2.PW.CaseWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristine Dukiet / Kelli Leonard vs Deirdre Mladsi / Rosa Messer6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusan Fairlee / Cyndy Fettig vs Jennifer Smith / Lisa Slater6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTiffani Campbell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-17vs 4.CAS.DeAngelisSplit 22
L#1 DoublesChristine Dukiet / Michele Mulcahy vs Joanne Kearney / Katrina KUCZYNSKI1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLori Jee / Megan Richardson vs Catherine Chan / Barbara Longobardo7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTiffani Campbell vs Jennifer Kuzma7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesBecky Briggs / Andrea Dusina vs Diane Hayes / Alissa Poggio7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2022-03-10vs 5.APEX.TandradinataLost 04
L#1 DoublesMichele Mulcahy / Kelli Leonard vs Kathleen Murray / Aulia Tandradinata3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCyndy Fettig / Lori Jee vs Terry Friddle / Virginia Brezac3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesTiffani Campbell vs Sarah Gilreath0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Dukiet / Sarah Butler vs Paula Dwyer / Jesse Shoemaker-Ramsey1-6, 0-6
2022-03-09vs 2.PW.CaseSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTiffani Campbell / Rebecca Roper vs Micha Federico / Martha Priest0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Fairlee / Lori Jee vs Jodi Case / Kimberly Hall6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesChristine Dukiet vs Janessa Core6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Keen / Michele Mulcahy vs Allison Kupfrian / Sarah van Saun6-1, 6-4
2022-03-03vs 1.APEX.HinckleySplit 11
W#2 DoublesMegan Richardson / Cyndy Fettig vs Michelle Chiaramonte / Jeannine McClung6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAndrea Dusina / Becky Briggs vs Kim Goll / Sheri Lieffrig1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Cyndy Fettig
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.18
Andrea Dusina
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.86
Michele Mulcahy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.85
Leslie Roper
published
2.83
Stefanie Logue
published
2.82
Lori Jee
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.80
Tiffani Campbell
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.75
Sarah Butler
published
2.60
Susan Keen
published
2.58
Megan Richardson
published
2.45
Christine Dukiet
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
2.08
Becky Briggs
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Jee + Cyndy Fettig9454% games+5.3% vs expected
Christine Dukiet + Michele Mulcahy81043% games−2.5% vs expected
Tiffani Campbell + Michele Mulcahy91042% games−4.5% vs expected
Christine Dukiet + Tiffani Campbell0729% gamesnot enough data
Christine Dukiet + Leslie Roper123 matchesnot enough data
Michele Mulcahy + Leslie Roper033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cyndy Fettig
132W–93L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Andrea Dusina
72W–70L career · type A · 9 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3
Michele Mulcahy
150W–166L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
Leslie Roper
12W–24L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
Stefanie Logue
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Lori Jee
76W–95L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Tiffani Campbell
86W–120L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Sarah Butler
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Susan Keen
3W–16L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60
Megan Richardson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Christine Dukiet
80W–150L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.45
2.5
Becky Briggs
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.