Teams

Racquet Club

2025 FALL A18&O WEEKEND · FALL 18&O 5.0 MEN

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-13vs The Players ClubSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrandon Griffin / Nicholas Aronoff vs Patrick McColgan / Aaron Koch4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMatthew Wareti vs Ben Hodgkiss-Lilly6-1, 6-1
2024-11-24vs WickertreeLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrandon Griffin / Leander Dixon vs Casey Cempre / Micah Scott4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSam Lessard vs Grant MacPherson2-6, 1-6
2024-10-25vs The Players ClubSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrandon Griffin / Leander Dixon vs Aaron Koch / David Hess0-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesOwen Alderman vs Nick Kowalczyk6-1, 7-6
2024-10-18vs WickertreeWon 10
W#1 SinglesMatthew Wareti vs Casey Cempre4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-09-20vs The Players ClubLost 12
L#1 DoublesNicholas Aronoff / Matthew Wareti vs Ben Hodgkiss-Lilly / Aaron Koch5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrandon Griffin vs David Hess1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLeander Dixon / Jordan Phelps vs Kavya Desai / Nick Kowalczyk6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for FALL 18&O 5.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.37 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Nicholas Aronoff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.50
Owen Alderman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.41
Matthew Wareti
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.38
Denys Alyeksyeyev
published 4.5
4.28
R Pepino
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Brandon Griffin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.14
Leander Dixon
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Jordan Phelps
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sam Lessard
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jordan Phelps + Matthew Wareti4165% games+9.2% vs expected
Leander Dixon + R Pepino224 matchesnot enough data
Nicholas Aronoff + Leander Dixon123 matchesnot enough data
Leander Dixon + Denys Alyeksyeyev123 matchesnot enough data
Owen Alderman + Denys Alyeksyeyev303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicholas Aronoff
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.51
Owen Alderman
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.50
Matthew Wareti
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
4.41
4.5
Denys Alyeksyeyev
45W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
4.38
R Pepino
32W–18L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
4.28
4.5
Brandon Griffin
6W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leander Dixon
35W–29L career · 8 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.14
Jordan Phelps
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sam Lessard
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.