Teams

BELVEDERE TC 40MX7.0A

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0

25 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Michael Barker
published
3.63
Christopher Sheldon
published 3.5
3.49
Ruben Kalra
published
3.48
Iain Hassall
published 3.5
3.47
Jessica Kaludis
published
3.45
Jay Potter
published
3.44
Nicole Barker
published
3.40
James Redfern
published 3.5
3.35
Annabelle Frankl
published 3.5
3.35
Kathryn Benson
published
3.34
Houman Behzadi
published 3.5
3.26
Max Catalano
published
3.25
Susan Gazor
published
David Flaherty
published 3.5
3.22
Nick Meyer
published
3.16
Vickie Rath
published
3.04
Samuel Hocking
published
2.82
Truth Doyle
published
2.78
Shirin Birjandi
published
Cynthia Webbe
published 3
2.70
Dana Sheldon
published 3
2.60
Alix Fagersten
published 3
2.55
Nooshin Behroyan
published
2.50
Zoe Johns
published
Rebecca Aherne
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Barker
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.74
3.5
Christopher Sheldon
17W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.63
Ruben Kalra
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Iain Hassall
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Jessica Kaludis
18W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
Jay Potter
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
Nicole Barker
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
James Redfern
23W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Annabelle Frankl
26W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
Kathryn Benson
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Houman Behzadi
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
Max Catalano
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Susan Gazor
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
David Flaherty
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nick Meyer
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
Vickie Rath
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
Samuel Hocking
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Truth Doyle
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.82
Shirin Birjandi
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Cynthia Webbe
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Dana Sheldon
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Alix Fagersten
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
Nooshin Behroyan
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Zoe Johns
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
Rebecca Aherne
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.