Teams

GCC BLUE

2024 TRIO - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TRIO

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-04-27vs PH GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesScott Blechman / Guto de Araujo vs Pierre Powell / Nick Politano3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-13vs LTFC REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesScott Blechman / Hunter Powell vs Andy Field / Carl Daugherty6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesGuto de Araujo vs Darren DuPree5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2024-04-06vs PH GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesScott Blechman / Kenneth Hunt vs Pierre Powell / William Licko6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-03-30vs MVCC NAVYWon 20
W#1 SinglesGuto de Araujo vs Scott Newcomb2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDouglas McDonald / Scott Blechman vs Steven Hardegen / Dave Evenson0-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
James Dempsey
published
3.30
Guto de Araujo
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Scott Blechman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Kenneth Hunt
published
3.18
Bob Trigg
published 3.5
2.95
Robert Clarke
published
Douglas McDonald
published
Hunter Powell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Blechman + Guto de Araujo4348% games−0.5% vs expected
Bob Trigg + Robert Clarke1444% games−1.8% vs expected
James Dempsey + Kenneth Hunt2348% gamesnot enough data
Scott Blechman + James Dempsey314 matchesnot enough data
Robert Clarke + James Dempsey314 matchesnot enough data
Guto de Araujo + Kenneth Hunt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

James Dempsey
16W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Guto de Araujo
67W–45L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Scott Blechman
58W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Kenneth Hunt
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Bob Trigg
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Robert Clarke
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.95
Douglas McDonald
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Hunter Powell
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.