Teams

BRMST RED

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-01vs LAC BLUEWon 32
L#1 DoublesChristine Babcock / Lyndsey Babcock vs Lindsey Cheney / Kathy Philipp3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJacy Bowers vs Natalya Walsworth6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJane Davis / Morgan Arvisais vs Becky Fase / Pamela Heiden6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesHillary Riley vs Dionne Jimenez1-0
L#3 DoublesMichele Gosselin / Kathy Schmidt vs Michelle Wieber / Lori Preston3-6, 5-7
2021-05-22vs LTA PURPLELost 23
L#1 DoublesMeghan Vogel / Michele Gosselin vs Veronique Foulon / Logan Newens3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesJacy Bowers vs Lynn Schulte6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSamantha Sutphin / Hillary Riley vs Catherine Romero / Ann Lomax1-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesMichelle Schulz vs Emily Creek1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesChristine Babcock / Lyndsey Babcock vs Linda Creek / Mary Prassa6-2, 7-5
2021-05-18vs LTA GREENLost 23
W#1 DoublesSamantha Sutphin / Meghan Vogel vs Tracey Graham / Susan Keenan6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesEmma Brandt vs Shannon Weisblatt6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMichele Gosselin / Jeanne Peoples vs Kimberly Ridings / Jency Paul6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLyndsey Babcock vs Reina Morrison1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJacy Bowers / Christine Babcock vs Sonja Gifford / Sara Fedorka1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-05-04vs BTA NAVYSplit 22
L#1 DoublesHillary Riley / Emma Brandt vs Tanya Goble / Jahnavi Brenner3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesMorgan Arvisais vs Lauren Dise1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichele Gosselin / Michelle Schulz vs Katherine Croasdale / Nicole McGann6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJacy Bowers / Kathy Schmidt vs Sue Mills / Aimee Miller6-2, 6-1
2021-04-27vs LAC BLUELost 14
W#1 DoublesJacy Bowers / Lyndsey Babcock vs Becky Fase / Pamela Heiden6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesEmma Brandt vs Paulette Medley4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichelle Schulz / Jane Davis vs Ursula Scarano / Dionne Jimenez1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMichele Gosselin vs Michelle Wieber1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJeanne Peoples / Hillary Riley vs Lindsey Cheney / Kathy Philipp3-6, 3-6
2021-04-20vs BCC YELLOWWon 40
W#1 DoublesMorgan Arvisais / Emma Brandt vs Audrey Chivukula / Amy Larson6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMeghan Vogel vs Leslie Herz6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSamantha Sutphin / Jeanne Peoples vs Natalyn Embree / Cindy Keith6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKathy Schmidt / Michelle Schulz vs Sherilyn Schreier / Petra McDonald6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Jacy Bowers
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.81
Meghan Vogel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.78
Emma Brandt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.77
Michele Gosselin
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.76
Samantha Sutphin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Hillary Riley
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.73
Michelle Schulz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.63
Jeanne Peoples
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Morgan Arvisais
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.51
Kathy Schmidt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lyndsey Babcock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Morgan Arvisais + Samantha Sutphin5064% games+8.8% vs expected
Kathy Schmidt + Jacy Bowers6262% games+7.2% vs expected
Jeanne Peoples + Michelle Schulz3250% games+3.3% vs expected
Jacy Bowers + Michelle Schulz3260% games+0.9% vs expected
Meghan Vogel + Michele Gosselin4252% games+0.9% vs expected
Jeanne Peoples + Michele Gosselin181453% games+0.8% vs expected
Kathy Schmidt + Jeanne Peoples4256% games+0.1% vs expected
Kathy Schmidt + Samantha Sutphin4349% games−0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jacy Bowers
135W–71L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.91
Meghan Vogel
40W–29L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Emma Brandt
76W–39L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Michele Gosselin
99W–91L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Samantha Sutphin
83W–57L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Hillary Riley
70W–65L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
Michelle Schulz
71W–49L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Jeanne Peoples
111W–110L career · 3 lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Morgan Arvisais
58W–56L career · 3 lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.56
Kathy Schmidt
54W–62L career · 3 lines in 2021
46%54%<1%
3.51
Lyndsey Babcock
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.