Teams

Corpus-Meet Your Match

2025 40 & Over Little State · Ladies 4.0 Flight

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-07vs San Antonio-Alamo HeightsLost 13
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Cromwell / Bridget Calkins vs Zdenka Edgar / Suzanna Harrison6-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesLinda Griffin vs Kayla Fonger3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDebbie Aldrighetti / Mary Lupe Arana vs Marianne Ryan / Anita Wilkinson5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJanet Knesek / Theresa Swirenko vs Pauline Bourgeois / Connie Koch7-6, 6-4
2025-06-06vs Austin-Serves UPSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSusan Temple / Jane Huston vs Morgan Angelone / Holly Paulson7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRebecca Pina vs Jodi Allen6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDonna Jackson / Janet Knesek vs Jill Coody Smits / Laura Kostelny0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDebbie Aldrighetti / Mary Lupe Arana vs Julie Asbra / Serene ZiCornell6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 4.0 Flight have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Debbie Aldrighetti
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.84
Rebecca Pina
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.79
Theresa Swirenko
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Linda Griffin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.76
Susan Temple
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Janet Knesek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Bridget Calkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Mary Lupe Arana
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Jane Huston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Elizabeth Cromwell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Trissia Keene
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Pina + Susan Temple2354% games−1.6% vs expected
Rebecca Pina + Debbie Aldrighetti3259% games−3.5% vs expected
Theresa Swirenko + Debbie Aldrighetti314 matchesnot enough data
Susan Temple + Debbie Aldrighetti303 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Aldrighetti + Mary Lupe Arana213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debbie Aldrighetti
34W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
4.05
Rebecca Pina
24W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
Theresa Swirenko
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Linda Griffin
18W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
Susan Temple
29W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
Janet Knesek
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Bridget Calkins
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mary Lupe Arana
14W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Jane Huston
36W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.59
Elizabeth Cromwell
26W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Trissia Keene
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.