Teams

MARION/Connor/65&Over6.0W

2023 Marion Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Adult Women 65 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-04-10vs Smash HitsWon 10
W#1 DoublesBetsy Calder / Patricia James vs Debby McCoy / Janice Lundy6-2, 6-2
2023-04-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesBetsy Calder / Patricia James vs Elizabeth Smith / Susan Kaar6-0, 6-2
2023-03-26Won 10
W#2 DoublesBetsy Calder / Patricia James vs Leah Stringer / Susan Kaar6-2, 6-4
2023-03-19vs Smash HitsWon 10
W#2 DoublesBetsy Calder / Patricia James vs Wanda Simpson / Kathryn Ellington6-1, 6-4
2023-03-03vs Smash HitsLost 01
L#1 DoublesBetsy Calder / Patricia James vs Margie McLellan / Jill Womble6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-02-26vs Smash HitsWon 10
W#1 DoublesBetsy Calder / Patricia James vs Wanda Simpson / Janet Greene7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult Women 65 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Patricia James
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Cindy Voigt
published 3
2.64
Donna Davis
published
2.63
Betsy Calder
published 3
2.59
Joan Matlock
published
2.58
CARMEL CONNOR
published 3
Emily Speaker
published
Leslie Hagan
published
Marianne Zitnick
published
Mary Stevens
published
Starling Bennett
published
Trish Mosby
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Davis + Starling Bennett224 matchesnot enough data
Mary Stevens + CARMEL CONNOR123 matchesnot enough data
Joan Matlock + CARMEL CONNOR213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patricia James
98W–75L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Cindy Voigt
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Donna Davis
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Betsy Calder
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
2.63
Joan Matlock
25W–37L career · no lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
2.59
3
CARMEL CONNOR
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
2.58
Emily Speaker
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Leslie Hagan
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marianne Zitnick
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Stevens
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Starling Bennett
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Trish Mosby
2W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.