Teams

55 & Over W8.0 - Baldrich Vivian Purcell

Adult 55 & Over 2022 · Adult 55 & Over W8.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.80 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#3 DoublesHolanda Sibilia / Johanna Padro vs Sara Velazquez / Carmen Liz6-1, 6-3
2022-03-13vs 55 & Over W8.0 - Charo PerezLost 01
L#3 DoublesSonia Lantigua-Garcia / Rebeca Carrion vs Anita Rivera / Marcelle Shub4-6, 2-6
2022-03-01Won 10
W#2 DoublesJohanna Padro / Holanda Sibilia vs Ilia Colom / Maria Flores6-2, 6-0
L#1 DoublesRUTH RAMOS / Rebeca Carrion vs Mari Carmen Bosch / Maria Esther Calvo7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHolanda Sibilia / Carmen Reyes vs Sonia Hormaza / Jennifer Bates6-0, 6-1
2022-01-29vs 55 & Over W8.0 - Charo PerezWon 10
W#3 DoublesRebeca Carrion / Lourdes Figueras vs Irma Nevarez / Carmen Espada6-4, 6-4
2022-01-15Won 20
W#2 DoublesRebeca Carrion / Milagros Roman vs Ana Andino Arellano / Wilma Colon6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHolanda Sibilia / Carmen Reyes vs Yamira Rivera / Rose Sanchez6-0, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over W8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
RUTH RAMOS
published
3.81
Holanda Sibilia
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Sonia Lantigua-Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Rebeca Carrion
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Gloria Colon
published 4
3.23
Lillian Nieves
published
Carmen Reyes
published 3
Johanna Padro
published
Linda Matienzo
published
Lourdes Figueras
published
Marta Mora
published
Milagros Roman
published
Vivian Purcell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gloria Colon + Lillian Nieves121050% games+3.2% vs expected
Rebeca Carrion + RUTH RAMOS11853% games−1.4% vs expected
Rebeca Carrion + Lourdes Figueras5551% gamesnot enough data
Milagros Roman + Gloria Colon6161% gamesnot enough data
Rebeca Carrion + Sonia Lantigua-Garcia2348% gamesnot enough data
Sonia Lantigua-Garcia + Linda Matienzo134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

RUTH RAMOS
45W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Holanda Sibilia
34W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Sonia Lantigua-Garcia
105W–71L career · 9 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Rebeca Carrion
87W–65L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Gloria Colon
24W–18L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.64
Lillian Nieves
25W–21L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Carmen Reyes
0W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Johanna Padro
25W–24L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Matienzo
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lourdes Figueras
9W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marta Mora
15W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Milagros Roman
25W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Vivian Purcell
9W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.