Teams

WRAC-THE WRAC PACK

2024 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-06-30vs EW-WRAC-NoydLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Blair / Patricia Houghton vs KIMBERLY HABICH / Michael Bendtsen3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Blair / Steve Ovenell vs Cynthia Noyd / Brad Bartol6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Linnell / Mark Miller vs Donna Parsons / Richard Lester0-6, 3-6
2024-06-29vs EW-WRAC-NoydLost 12
L#1 DoublesJim Kellogg / Renee Patton vs KIMBERLY HABICH / Richard Lester2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSteve Ovenell / Leslie Blair vs Ellen Lester / Michael Bendtsen7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMark Miller / Elizabeth Linnell vs Cynthia Noyd / Bryan Noyd6-7, 3-6
2024-06-29vs CBRC-MehlenbacherLost 12
W#1 DoublesPatricia Houghton / Scott Blair vs Wayne Kohan / Wilhelmina Leuschen6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJim Kellogg / Renee Patton vs Evan Mehlenbacher / Paula Davis-Vedder4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMark Miller / Elizabeth Linnell vs Adam Hrebeniuk / Huijuan Zhang5-7, 4-6
2024-06-28vs CBRC-MehlenbacherLost 12
W#1 DoublesJim Kellogg / Renee Patton vs Adam Hrebeniuk / Huijuan Zhang6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeslie Blair / Steve Ovenell vs Evan Mehlenbacher / Paula Davis-Vedder5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesScott Blair / Patricia Houghton vs Bryan Coles / Kathy Mehlenbacher2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-WRAC-Noyd40102578
2CBRC-Mehlenbacher225715116
3WRAC-THE WRAC PACK043921146

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Patricia Houghton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.27
Elizabeth Linnell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jim Kellogg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Leslie Blair
published
Renee Patton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Scott Blair
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Steve Ovenell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Patton + Jim Kellogg123 matchesnot enough data
Scott Blair + Patricia Houghton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Patricia Houghton
67W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Linnell
41W–43L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Jim Kellogg
19W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Leslie Blair
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Renee Patton
4W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Blair
1W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Steve Ovenell
13W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.