Teams

CVTA BLUE

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.55 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-29vs RMTC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesCraig Hoeltgen / Brandon Jacquez vs Quinn Elliott / Greg Mionske6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesConnor Buchanan vs Cedric Scotto6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPaul Kolachov / AJ Johnson vs Joshua Harrison / Azur Ali2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAndy Antos / Keaton Howe vs Louis Amundson / Ralph Noordink5-7, 4-6
2025-05-22vs MEA PURPLEWon 50
W#1 DoublesEric Maier / Peter Fitzgerald vs Xinlin Li / Johan Mudsam6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesConnor Buchanan vs Andrew Chernaik2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCraig Hoeltgen / Matt Miller vs Michael Winters / James Bray6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAJ Johnson vs Peter Braun2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndrew Schifle / Pranav Barve vs Rex Vedder / Tim Grayson6-2, 6-3
2025-05-15vs LTA-Q BLACKWon 40
W#1 DoublesEric Maier / Peter Fitzgerald vs Marco Scalise / Clayton McLaughlin6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesConnor Ohlsen vs Zach Yauman6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAJ Johnson / Paul Kolachov vs Mark Hinman / Ross Becker6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrandon Jacquez / Pranav Barve vs Idi Omar / Judson Smith6-0, 6-0
2025-05-08vs TTA REDWon 50
W#1 DoublesEric Maier / Craig Hoeltgen vs Anthony Garcia / Ian Harris6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesConnor Ohlsen vs Steven Alvarado6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPaul Kolachov / Matt Miller vs Ryan Pelton / Marcel de Graaf6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesConnor Buchanan vs Brandt Theander6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPranav Barve / Andy Antos vs Philip Dixon-Patterson / Dylan Griffin6-3, 7-5
2025-05-03vs MEA NAVYWon 50
W#1 DoublesMatt Miller / AJ Johnson vs Peter Walters / Donnie Martin6-2, 2-0
W#1 SinglesConnor Ohlsen vs Charles Gomulka6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPeter Fitzgerald / Craig Hoeltgen vs Steve Savage / Graham Blanco6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesConnor Buchanan vs Bruce Wiener6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBrandon Jacquez / Andrew Schifle vs Matt Schwartz / Ian Schwartz6-2, 6-3
2025-05-01vs RCC ORANGEWon 32
W#1 DoublesEric Maier / Matt Miller vs Alex Le / Bobby Virasingh6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAJ Johnson vs Sam Granberry2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPeter Fitzgerald / Craig Hoeltgen vs Alex Pedersen / Matthew Palmer7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesConnor Ohlsen vs Graham Hill6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKeaton Howe / Brandon Jacquez vs Scott Gorrell / Christopher Johnson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.39 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Connor Ohlsen
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.47
Eric Maier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.46
Peter Fitzgerald
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.43
Craig Hoeltgen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.42
AJ Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.41
Connor Buchanan
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 5
4.41
Andrew Schifle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.34
Paul Kolachov
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.33
Brandon Jacquez
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.31
Pranav Barve
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Andy Antos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Keaton Howe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Maier + Peter Fitzgerald12072% games+12.2% vs expected
Paul Kolachov + Eric Maier7067% games+8.9% vs expected
Craig Hoeltgen + Andrew Schifle5164% games+6.2% vs expected
Pranav Barve + Brandon Jacquez5261% games+5.8% vs expected
Connor Ohlsen + Craig Hoeltgen11360% games+5.3% vs expected
Craig Hoeltgen + Eric Maier6165% games+2.4% vs expected
Paul Kolachov + AJ Johnson5060% games−1.4% vs expected
Pranav Barve + Keaton Howe4446% games−4.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Connor Ohlsen
66W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
4.49
4.5
Eric Maier
69W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
4.47
Peter Fitzgerald
35W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
4.46
4.5
Craig Hoeltgen
67W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
4.43
4.5
AJ Johnson
55W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
4.42
5
Connor Buchanan
21W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
4.41
4.5
Andrew Schifle
39W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Paul Kolachov
44W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
Brandon Jacquez
66W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.33
4.5
Pranav Barve
28W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Andy Antos
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Keaton Howe
46W–68L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
4.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.