Teams

FTA18C/SpauldingFarms/AngieHill

FTA COMBO 18 & OVER FTA Nights · 6.5 Women - Tuesday nights

17 players · average NTRP 3.27 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-23vs FTA18C/AcacSportsclub/CarterLost 02
L#2 DoublesGina Pelino / Jacque Foster vs Stefani Wallen-Smith / XiaoLi Saliny3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBlair Zeimetz / Anne Illges vs Gina Carter / Stephanie Painter1-6, 5-7
2025-09-16vs FTA18C/Brookstone/DepuyLost 02
L#1 DoublesAngie Hill / Hope Moriarty vs Paige Botts / Daniela Robertson6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTracy Chastain / Jacque Foster vs Holly Humphries / Kara Powder4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-09-02vs FTA18C/AcacSportsclub/CarterWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmanda Powell / Cindy Hradec vs Stephanie Tolbert / Maria Miller6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPatricia Surles / Holly Chittenden vs Rachael Shepherd / Kelly Lewis6-2, 6-3
2025-08-28vs FTA18C/Brookstone/DepuySplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmanda Powell / Cindy Hradec vs Jenna Spencer / Brandy McNair7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHolly Chittenden / Patricia Surles vs TRINA NEGRI / Doni Willmering6-1, 7-5
2025-08-26vs FTA18C/Brookstone/DepuyWon 21
W#1 DoublesDanielle Henderson / Patricia Surles vs TRINA NEGRI / Daniela Robertson6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJennifer Street / Sherri Daniel vs Samantha Depuy / Holly Humphries7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAngie Hill / Hope Moriarty vs Caroline Stewart / Paige Botts1-6, 4-6
2025-08-12vs FTA18C/AcacSportsclub/CarterWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmanda Powell / Cindy Hradec vs Kelly Lewis / Stephanie Tolbert6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHolly Chittenden / Patricia Surles vs Maria Miller / George-Anna Lyden6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women - Tuesday nights have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Patricia Surles
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.40
Amanda Powell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.37
Danielle Henderson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Jacque Foster
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Hope Moriarty
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Anne Illges
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Holly Chittenden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Cindy Hradec
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Missy Lawlor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Blair Zeimetz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Tracy Chastain
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Natalie Ruggiero
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.79
Gina Pelino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Sherri Daniel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Beth Anne Eads
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Tracey MacDonald
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Elizabeth Faulkner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Chittenden + Patricia Surles11463% games+8.3% vs expected
Natalie Ruggiero + Cindy Hradec4257% games+0.2% vs expected
Blair Zeimetz + Natalie Ruggiero4544% games−3.5% vs expected
Tracey MacDonald + Cindy Hradec4253% games−4.6% vs expected
Blair Zeimetz + Patricia Surles6071% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Faulkner + Tracy Chastain1540% gamesnot enough data
Danielle Henderson + Amanda Powell224 matchesnot enough data
Blair Zeimetz + Tracy Chastain303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patricia Surles
63W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Amanda Powell
22W–31L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Danielle Henderson
31W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Jacque Foster
31W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Hope Moriarty
29W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Anne Illges
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Holly Chittenden
14W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Cindy Hradec
49W–27L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.16
Missy Lawlor
12W–43L career · 1 line in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.91
3
Blair Zeimetz
46W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
Tracy Chastain
18W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
Natalie Ruggiero
42W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Gina Pelino
38W–52L career · 1 line in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
Sherri Daniel
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Beth Anne Eads
29W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
Tracey MacDonald
23W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Elizabeth Faulkner
15W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.